Draft Combined Authorities (Mayoral Elections) (Amendment) Order 2026
356Ayes
86Noes
Carried · majority 270 · Government won201 did not vote
643 Members · Aye 356 · No 86 · DNV 201 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
MPs voted on 9 June 2026 to approve the Draft Combined Authorities (Mayoral Elections) (Amendment) Order 2026, a piece of secondary legislation (a statutory instrument, meaning a law made under powers granted by an earlier Act of Parliament) updating the election rules for combined authority mayors in England. The order passed by 356 votes to 86. The vote's practical purpose is to implement the supplementary vote (SV) system for combined authority and combined county authority mayoral elections. Under SV, voters express a first and second preference, and candidates with the fewest votes are eliminated with their second preferences redistributed until one candidate holds a majority. The order makes the technical changes to election conduct rules necessary to put SV into operation following the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act 2026, which received Royal Assent in April and provided the primary legislative basis for the change. The division fell almost entirely along party lines. All 283 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted supported the order, as did all 64 Liberal Democrats and all 5 Green MPs who voted. Eighty-one of the Conservatives who voted opposed it, along with 2 Democratic Unionist Party MPs, 1 Traditional Unionist Voice MP, and 1 Reform UK MP. The Conservative position, set out in committee by David Simmonds, was explicit opposition to reversing the first past the post system that the previous government had introduced. The Liberal Democrats backed the change but said they would have preferred the government to go further and adopt the alternative vote system.
Voting Aye meant
Support reintroducing the supplementary vote system for mayoral elections, arguing it gives elected mayors a broader democratic mandate
Voting No meant
Oppose the change, preferring first past the post as a simpler and more straightforward voting system, and objecting to reversing a previous Conservative reform
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
254
0
106
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
81
35
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
64
0
8
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
29
0
13
Independent
—
5
1
6
Reform UK
—
0
1
7
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
0
2
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
1
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
0
1
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
The Government has failed to brief the opposition on national security legislation in advance, giving media access hours before laying the Bill, with the opposition briefing scheduled only after amendments close.Conservative · Voted teller_no · Read full speech (197 words) →
While advance briefing would have been courteous, the Deputy Speaker has no power to compel Ministers to provide it; copies of the Bill are now available.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (267 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0