Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | +7 | 57% on-whip · 322 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | -16 | 34% on-whip · 100 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | +50 | 100% on-whip · 65 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | +7 | 57% on-whip · 36 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | +16 | 66% on-whip · 10 MPs | |
| Reform UK | Ref | +22 | 72% on-whip · 6 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | +36 | 86% on-whip · 5 MPs | |
| Plaid Cymru | Plaid | +50 | 100% on-whip · 4 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jun 2026 | Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill Committee: New Clause 4 Aye: Support requiring parliamentary scrutiny of government financial assistance to the steel industry before it is provided, ensuring MPs can examine the costs, conditions, and purposes of any public money committed · No: Oppose imposing prior parliamentary approval requirements on financial assistance to steel, preferring to preserve ministerial flexibility to act quickly in support of a strategically important industry | 157 | 288 | No |
| 9 Jun 2026 | Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill Committee: Amendment 20 Aye: Support requiring NAO sign-off before public money is given to the nationalised steel industry, to protect taxpayers from open-ended financial commitments. · No: Oppose adding this constraint, backing the government's freedom to provide financial assistance to the steel industry without a mandatory NAO value-for-money check. | 91 | 293 | No |
| 9 Jun 2026 | Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill Committee: New Clause 12 Aye: Support capping public financial assistance to British Steel at £2.5 billion, arguing the government needs spending limits and a clear exit strategy rather than unlimited, open-ended state funding. · No: Reject the cap, backing the government's approach of retaining flexibility to provide whatever financial support British Steel requires without a fixed ceiling. | 96 | 297 | No |
| 8 Jun 2026 | Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill Committee: Amendment 12 Aye: Support limiting the government's nationalisation powers with a hard time limit, preventing open-ended state intervention in the steel industry without a clear exit strategy. · No: Oppose restricting the government's ability to renew intervention powers, arguing that long-term industrial policy requires flexibility and that removing this option would create uncertainty for the steel sector. | 83 | 267 | No |
| 8 Jun 2026 | Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill Committee: New Clause 8 Aye: Support requiring the government to be transparent about the financial risks and hidden liabilities taxpayers could inherit before any steel nationalisation goes ahead. · No: Oppose the additional parliamentary disclosure requirement, backing the government's position that it has sufficient accountability mechanisms and the Bill should proceed without this constraint. | 148 | 253 | No |
All 7 divisions on this issue →
By party, the MPs whose voting record on industrial policy is most closely tracking the party majority. A fuller “most active by speech volume + written questions” ranking is pending — needs per-issue speech aggregation.
LabLabour Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Siobhain McDonagh | Mitcham and Morden | 75% |
| Sharon Hodgson | Washington and Gateshead South | 75% |
| Emily Thornberry | Islington South and Finsbury | 75% |
ConConservative and Unionist Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Richard Holden | Basildon and Billericay | 67% |
| Iain Duncan Smith | Chingford and Woodford Green | 50% |
| Caroline Johnson | Sleaford and North Hykeham | 50% |
LDLiberal Democrats
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Ed Davey | Kingston and Surbiton | 100% |
| Andrew George | St Ives | 100% |
| Tim Farron | Westmorland and Lonsdale | 100% |
LabLabour and Co-operative Party
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Oliver Ryan | Burnley | 80% |
| Florence Eshalomi | Vauxhall and Camberwell Green | 75% |
| Helena Dollimore | Hastings and Rye | 75% |
IndIndependent
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Cameron Thomas | Tewkesbury | 100% |
| Ayoub Khan | Birmingham Perry Barr | 100% |
| Shockat Adam | Leicester South | 80% |
RefReform UK
| MP | Constituency | % on-whip |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Rosindell | Romford | 75% |
| Lee Anderson | Ashfield | 75% |
| Richard Tice | Boston and Skegness | 57% |
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Industrial Policy” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.