A divisionDivision No. 15 · Tuesday, 9 June 2026· Commons· Industrial Policy

Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill Committee: Amendment 20

90Ayes
290Noes
Defeated · majority 200 · Government won
263 did not vote
Aye90No290DID NOT VOTE · 263

643 Members · Aye 90 · No 290 · DNV 263 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 9 June 2026 to reject Amendment 20 to the Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill at committee stage. The amendment was defeated by 290 votes to 90. It would have inserted a condition into clause 58 of the bill requiring that the Secretary of State could only provide financial assistance to a steel undertaking if the National Audit Office had first concluded that doing so would secure value for money for taxpayers. The bill as it stands gives the Secretary of State broad powers to provide financial assistance in connection with the nationalisation of the steel industry. Amendment 20 sought to place a specific constraint on those powers by making National Audit Office sign-off a prerequisite for any financial assistance. Supporters argued this was necessary to prevent the legislation from becoming a blank cheque on the public purse. Opponents argued against the amendment, with the vote's outcome meaning the bill proceeds without this condition attached to financial assistance powers. The division split almost entirely along party lines. All 251 Labour MPs and 26 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment. The 82 Conservative MPs who voted all supported it, alongside four Democratic Unionist Party members, one Traditional Unionist Voice member, one Restore Britain member, and two independents. Reform UK's three voting members voted against the amendment, as did the four Plaid Cymru members and two Your Party members. The vote follows a series of similar defeats for opposition amendments to the bill across both 8 and 9 June, in which Conservative-led changes to constrain ministerial powers were consistently voted down by the government majority.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring NAO sign-off before public money is given to the nationalised steel industry, to protect taxpayers from open-ended financial commitments.
Voting No meant
Oppose adding this constraint, backing the government's freedom to provide financial assistance to the steel industry without a mandatory NAO value-for-money check.
§ 01Who voted how.380 voting Members · 263 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.

Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted No
0
251
109
Conservative and Unionist Party
Voted Aye
82
0
34
Liberal Democrats
0
0
71
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted No
0
26
16
Independent
2
7
4
Reform UK
Voted No
0
3
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Voted Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
0
0
5
Plaid Cymru
Voted No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division

Votes by party (CSV) · Premium
§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Sarah OlneySupportiveRichmond Park
Broadly welcomes the Bill as temporary emergency action but supports amendments 7, 8, 9 and 6 to strengthen environmental liability assessment, parliamentary scrutiny of financial assistance, and explicit consideration of tariffs and carbon border adjustments in valuations.Liberal Democrats · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (4,303 words)
Toby PerkinsSupportiveChesterfield
Welcomes government investment in steel as essential to national security and defence capability; emphasises need for careful management of tariff regime to avoid harming downstream manufacturers and steel stockholders.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (3,547 words)
Dame Harriett BaldwinOpposedWest Worcestershire
Opposes open-ended powers and unlimited financial exposure; supports amendments capping assistance at £1m per employee over five years, requiring quarterly parliamentary reporting, limiting total assistance to £2.5bn, and establishing a duty to seek private sector purchasers.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,684 words)
Cat EcclesSupportiveStourbridge
Opposes new clause 9 (private purchaser duty) and new clause 11 (level playing field requirement) as risks to downstream steel-dependent industries; seeks exemptions or transitional arrangements for grades not domestically produced.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,486 words)
Calvin BaileySupportiveLeyton and Wanstead
Supports government intervention but warns that amendments risk procedural barriers and impediments to defence supply-chain security; emphasises need for integrated steelmaking strategy from ore through production.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (648 words)
Richard TiceQuestioningBoston and Skegness
Defends blast furnace capability at Scunthorpe as strategically vital; questions whether NAO auditors should make sovereign capability decisions and warns that constant availability for sale destabilises business and workforce.Reform UK · Voted no · Read full speech (757 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0