A divisionDivision No. 475 · Tuesday, 14 April 2026· Commons· Crime and Policing

Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 359

277Ayes
158Noes
Carried · majority 119 · Government won
213 did not vote
Aye279No158DID NOT VOTE · 213

648 Members · Aye 277 · No 158 · DNV 213 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

The House of Commons voted on 14 April 2026 to reject a Lords amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill that would have formally proscribed Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organisation. The motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 359 passed by 277 votes to 158, with the government's position prevailing. Proscription of a group as a terrorist organisation under UK law carries significant legal consequences, including making membership, support, and fundraising for the group criminal offences. The Lords amendment would have placed the IRGC in the same legal category as groups such as al-Qaeda or Hizballah. By rejecting the amendment, the government preserved the status quo in which the IRGC is not formally proscribed, and instead pointed to existing measures, particularly the foreign influence registration scheme, as the appropriate tools for addressing threats posed by the organisation. Critics argued those tools are insufficient given the IRGC's alleged activities on British soil. The vote divided largely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 248 Labour MPs and all 26 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the government's rejection of the amendment. The Conservative Party, all 84 of its voting members, backed the Lords amendment, as did 58 of 72 voting Liberal Democrats. Notably, one Liberal Democrat voted with the government. The Democratic Unionist Party, Plaid Cymru, the Green Party, Ulster Unionist Party, and Traditional Unionist Voice all voted against the government. The division reflects a recurring tension in the bill's passage, with related votes on 20 April 2026 showing a similar pattern of around 290 ayes to 158 noes as the bill continued its parliamentary journey between the two chambers.

Voting Aye meant
Support the government's rejection of the Lords amendment, preferring existing tools like the foreign influence registration scheme over formally proscribing the IRGC as a terrorist organisation
Voting No meant
Support the Lords amendment to proscribe the IRGC as a terrorist organisation, arguing it poses a direct and serious threat to people in the UK and that current measures are insufficient
§ 01Who voted how.435 voting Members · 213 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
247
0
114
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
84
32
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
1
58
13
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
26
0
16
Independent
5
2
6
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
8
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
3
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.1 principal speaker
Sarah JonesSupportiveCroydon West
Moved motions to disagree with specific Lords amendments on crime and policing measures while agreeing with the majority of Lords amendments on respect orders and related provisions.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0