A divisionDivision No. 474 · Tuesday, 14 April 2026· Commons· Crime and Policing

Crime and Policing Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 357

278Ayes
73Noes
Carried · majority 205 · Government won
296 did not vote
Aye279No75DID NOT VOTE · 296

647 Members · Aye 278 · No 73 · DNV 296 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

The House of Commons voted on 14 April 2026 to reject Lords Amendment 357 to the Crime and Policing Bill, passing the motion to disagree by 278 votes to 73. The amendment, passed by the House of Lords, would have removed the so-called "historical safeguard" from the offence of encouraging terrorism. That safeguard currently protects people from prosecution when discussing terrorist acts by proscribed organisations in contexts that could be characterised as legitimate political or historical commentary. The vote preserves existing protections built into terrorism law that distinguish between genuinely glorifying or encouraging violence and engaging in political or academic debate about past events. Removing the safeguard, as the Lords wanted, would have made it easier to prosecute individuals who speak approvingly of acts carried out by banned organisations, even where the context is historical or political rather than incitement to future violence. The government argued the change would risk criminalising a wide range of legitimate discourse, including discussion of conflicts where the moral status of armed groups remains genuinely contested. The division did not follow normal government-versus-opposition lines. All 277 Labour and Labour-Co-operative MPs who voted backed the government. The Liberal Democrats, with 61 votes against, provided the bulk of opposition, joined by the Democratic Unionist Party (5), Plaid Cymru (3), and smaller unionist and nationalist groupings. Notably the Conservatives are entirely absent from the breakdown, suggesting they either abstained en masse or were not present. The vote is one of several exchanges between Commons and Lords on this bill, with further ping-pong (the process by which the two Houses exchange amendments until agreement is reached) continuing into a session on 20 April 2026.

Voting Aye meant
Support the government in rejecting the Lords amendment, preserving the 'historical safeguard' that protects legitimate political discourse about terrorism from prosecution under encouragement-of-terrorism laws
Voting No meant
Support the Lords amendment, arguing that glorifying acts of terrorism by proscribed organisations should not benefit from the historical safeguard, and that the current law is too permissive
§ 01Who voted how.351 voting Members · 296 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
250
0
111
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
61
11
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
26
0
16
Independent
2
3
8
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
8
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
0
1
4
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
3
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0
Your Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.1 principal speaker
Sarah JonesSupportiveCroydon West
Moved motions to disagree with specific Lords amendments on crime and policing measures while agreeing with the majority of Lords amendments on respect orders and related provisions.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0