Employment Rights Bill: Motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 23
Monday, 15 September 2025 · Division No. 296 · Commons
157 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support rejecting the Lords amendment, backing the government's plan to extend unfair dismissal protections from day one of employment without a qualifying period
Voting No means
Oppose removing the Lords amendment, arguing that probationary periods allow employers to take a chance on new workers and that eliminating them will deter hiring, particularly of young people, and expose businesses to costly tribunal proceedings
What happened: The House of Commons voted on 15 September 2025 to disagree with Lords Amendment 23 to the Employment Rights Bill, effectively rejecting a change the House of Lords had made to the legislation. The motion passed by 329 votes to 163, with the government securing a comfortable majority. This vote was part of the parliamentary process known as ping-pong, in which the two chambers exchange amendments until they reach agreement.
Why it matters: Lords Amendment 23 sought to modify provisions in the Employment Rights Bill that the government wished to maintain in their original form. By voting to disagree with the Lords amendment, MPs preserved the government's preferred wording of the Bill, keeping intact employment rights provisions that the Lords had sought to alter. The Employment Rights Bill is a significant piece of legislation intended to strengthen protections for workers across the UK, and each amendment dispute in ping-pong determines the final shape of those protections.
The politics: The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously in favour at 308 combined ayes, joined by the SNP (8), the Greens (3), Plaid Cymru (3) and several independents. Conservatives (85 no), Liberal Democrats (66 no), Reform UK (7 no) and the DUP (2 no) all voted against. There were no notable cross-party rebels within Labour's ranks. This result fits a broader pattern: the same bill saw multiple similar divisions in December 2025, with the government consistently winning by comparable margins, suggesting the Lords' amendments were being systematically rejected as the Bill moved toward its final form.
How They Voted
Government position: Aye
Related Votes
Opposition day: Seasonal work
10 Dec 2025
Government Amendment to Opposition day debate on seasonal work
10 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to Lords Amendment 1B but to propose Government amendments (a) and (b) in lieu of Lords Amendment 1B
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to LA23 and LA106 to LA120, not to insist on Commons Amendment 120C, 120D and 120E but to propose Gov (a) to (f) in lieu of LA23 and LA106 to LA120
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to Lords Amendment 48B but to propose Government amendment (a) and (b) in lieu of LA48B
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion not to insist on Commons Amendment 72C but to disagree with LA72D to LA72H and to propose Gov (a) and (b) in lieu of LA72D to LA72H
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to LA62 but not to insist on Commons Amendment 62C and to propose Gov (a) in lieu of LA62
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1B
5 Nov 2025
Employment Rights Bill: motion relating to Lords Reason 120B
5 Nov 2025
Employment Rights Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 48B
5 Nov 2025