Employment Rights Bill: motion relating to Lords Reason 120B
Wednesday, 5 November 2025 · Division No. 340 · Commons
185 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support the government's version of the Employment Rights Bill, overriding Lords amendments and maintaining stronger employment protections including fairer unfair dismissal rules for young workers
Voting No means
Back the Lords amendments, expressing concern that the government's employment rights changes will make employers less likely to hire young or entry-level workers and will harm business
Parliament voted on 5 November 2025 to support the government's position in a dispute with the House of Lords over the Employment Rights Bill, passing a motion that rejected or modified several Lords amendments. The result was 308 votes in favour and 153 against. The motion covered several contested areas of the Bill, including day one unfair dismissal rights, guaranteed hours for workers, provisions relating to heritage rail volunteering, trade union political funds, and the thresholds required for lawful industrial action ballots.
The vote advances one of the most substantial pieces of employment legislation in years. In practical terms, it pushes forward protections such as day one rights against unfair dismissal, new obligations on employers to offer guaranteed hours to workers on zero-hours arrangements, and a reversal of trade union ballot thresholds introduced under the Trade Union Act 2016. The Bill affects millions of workers in sectors including hospitality, retail, and seasonal industries, as well as employers of all sizes and trade unions operating across the economy.
The division split almost entirely along party lines. Labour MPs, including Labour and Co-operative members, voted unanimously in favour. Conservatives and Liberal Democrats voted against, joining Reform UK in opposition. Smaller parties including the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, and the Greens backed the government. There were no notable cross-party rebellions. The vote is part of a prolonged parliamentary back-and-forth between the Commons and the Lords, with further divisions on the Bill recorded in December 2025, suggesting the legislation continued to face resistance in the upper chamber before ultimately proceeding through Parliament.
How They Voted
Government position: Aye
What They Said in the Debate
Conservative · Arundel and South Downs
Opposed the Bill as rushed and half-baked, warning it will reduce youth hiring, create unemployment, and burden small businesses with compliance costs; called for meaningful compromises on qualifying periods, seasonal work, and guaranteed hours obligations.
Voted No
Liberal Democrat · Richmond Park
Supported the Bill's aims but urged amendments to clarify probation periods, change guaranteed hours to a right-to-request model, and maintain the 50% ballot threshold; argued for balance between worker security and business flexibility.
Voted No
Labour · Halifax
Defended rejecting Lords amendments on day-one unfair dismissal rights, guaranteed hours, and strike ballot thresholds; argued these are core manifesto commitments that will provide security and dignity for workers while supporting fair employers.
Voted Aye
Labour · Ashton-under-Lyne
Passionately defended the Bill as delivering a new deal for working people, rejecting compromise amendments as attempts to water down manifesto promises; emphasized worker dignity and cited support from businesses like the Co-op and Richer Sounds.
Voted Aye
Labour · Ellesmere Port and Bromborough
Strongly opposed Lords amendments, particularly on zero-hours contracts and ballot thresholds; argued day-one unfair dismissal rights are essential and did not prevent probation periods; cited OECD evidence that employment regulation does not reduce employment.
Voted Aye
Labour · Blyth and Ashington
Defended the Bill as a manifesto pledge voted for by millions; cited research showing 73% of employers support day-one unfair dismissal rights; challenged Opposition claims about union influence by noting trade union support is transparent and democratic.
Voted Aye
Labour · Middlesbrough and Thornaby East
Strongly opposed all Lords amendments, arguing they would water down manifesto commitments on day-one rights, guaranteed hours, and ballot thresholds; framed the Bill as essential to raising living standards after 14 years of wage suppression.
Voted Aye
Labour · Tipton and Wednesbury
Declared no concessions on the Bill; opposed political fund opt-in and ballot thresholds as undemocratic attacks on worker voice; committed to full repeal of the Trade Union Act 2016.
Voted Aye
Related Votes
Opposition Day: Youth unemployment
28 Jan 2026
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to disagree with the Lords in their Amendment 120N to Commons Amendment 120G and their Amendments 120P to 120S to Commons Amendment 120H
15 Dec 2025
Opposition day: Seasonal work
10 Dec 2025
Government Amendment to Opposition day debate on seasonal work
10 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to Lords Amendment 1B but to propose Government amendments (a) and (b) in lieu of Lords Amendment 1B
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to LA23 and LA106 to LA120, not to insist on Commons Amendment 120C, 120D and 120E but to propose Gov (a) to (f) in lieu of LA23 and LA106 to LA120
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to Lords Amendment 48B but to propose Government amendment (a) and (b) in lieu of LA48B
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion not to insist on Commons Amendment 72C but to disagree with LA72D to LA72H and to propose Gov (a) and (b) in lieu of LA72D to LA72H
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to LA62 but not to insist on Commons Amendment 62C and to propose Gov (a) in lieu of LA62
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1B
5 Nov 2025