Sentencing Guidelines Third Reading
Wednesday, 30 April 2025 · Division No. 186 · Commons
429 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support passing the bill to limit the Sentencing Council's power to issue guidelines recommending pre-sentence reports based on demographic group membership, ensuring sentencing-related guidance does not differentiate by personal characteristics
Voting No means
Oppose passing the bill, potentially arguing it is unnecessary, overly restrictive of the Sentencing Council's independence, or inadequate in addressing concerns about consistency in pre-sentence reports
What happened: The House of Commons passed the Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-Sentence Reports) Bill at its Third Reading on 30 April 2025. The vote was 214 in favour and 3 against, with the bill clearing this final Commons stage by an overwhelming margin. Third Reading is the last opportunity for the full House to approve or reject a bill before it moves to the House of Lords.
Why it matters: The bill establishes new legal requirements governing pre-sentence reports in criminal cases. Pre-sentence reports are documents prepared by probation services that give judges information about a defendant's background, circumstances, and risk factors before a sentence is handed down. By placing new requirements around these reports in statute, the legislation seeks to make the use of such reports more consistent and evidence-based across the courts of England and Wales. The bill directly affects defendants, probation services, and the judiciary, and forms part of the government's broader approach to criminal justice reform.
The politics: The vote was almost entirely a Labour affair, with 186 Labour MPs and 28 Labour and Co-operative MPs voting in favour and no opposition from any Conservative, Liberal Democrat, or other major party. The three votes against came from the Green Party. Both the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats were fully absent from the division, as were the Democratic Unionist Party and Sinn Féin. The near-unanimous passing margin, combined with the absence of the main opposition, gave the bill an uncontested passage at this stage, though the lack of engagement from opposition parties rather than active support meant the vote reflected attendance patterns as much as genuine cross-party consensus.
How They Voted
Government position: Aye
Related Votes
Unauthorised Entry to Football Matches Bill Report: Amendment 1
11 Jul 2025
Draft Criminal Justice Act 2003 (Suitability for Fixed Term Recall) Order 2025
2 Jul 2025
Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2025
2 Jul 2025
Crime and Policing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 7
18 Jun 2025
Crime and Policing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 43
18 Jun 2025
Crime and Policing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 88
18 Jun 2025
Crime and Policing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 121
18 Jun 2025
Crime and Policing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 130
18 Jun 2025
Crime and Policing Bill: Third Reading
18 Jun 2025
Crime and Policing Bill Report Stage: Amendment 174
17 Jun 2025