A divisionDivision No. 234 · Wednesday, 18 June 2025· Commons· Crime & Policing

Crime and Policing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 7

102Ayes
390Noes
Defeated · majority 288 · Government won
156 did not vote
Aye104No389DID NOT VOTE · 156

648 Members · Aye 102 · No 390 · DNV 156 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

MPs defeated a Conservative-proposed new clause to the Crime and Policing Bill on 18 June 2025, voting 390 to 102 against New Clause 7, which sought to change how police record non-crime hate incidents. Non-crime hate incidents are complaints about behaviour perceived as hateful but falling short of a criminal threshold; the existing framework allows police to log such incidents against the person complained about, even where no offence has been committed. The vote matters because the recording of non-crime hate incidents has been the subject of sustained legal and political controversy. Critics argue the current system can deter people from expressing lawful views, since a record may show up in enhanced background checks. The Conservative amendment aimed to restrict or reform that recording practice on free speech grounds. By defeating the clause, the House left the existing framework intact, at least for the purposes of this bill. The division split almost entirely along party lines. All 91 Conservative MPs who voted backed the new clause, joined by 7 Reform UK members, 2 Democratic Unionist Party members, and 2 independents. Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Labour and Co-operative Party, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and the two Your Party members all voted against. The Green MP Siân Berry explicitly said in debate that she did not support New Clause 7. The Government opposed the amendment, and its large Commons majority was sufficient to defeat it by a margin of nearly four to one.

Voting Aye meant
Support reforming or restricting police recording of non-crime hate incidents, on free speech grounds
Voting No meant
Oppose the Conservative amendment, defending the existing non-crime hate incident recording framework
§ 01Who voted how.492 voting Members · 156 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
281
80
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
91
0
25
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
64
7
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
28
14
Independent
2
6
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Tonia AntoniazziSupportiveGower
Proposed New Clause 2 to criminalise commercial sexual exploitation by third parties, including those profiting from prostitution and operating websites with adverts.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,884 words)
Judith CumminsSupportiveBradford South
Introduced New Clause 3 to make it an offence to pay for sex, and New Clause 4 to decriminalise victims of commercial sexual exploitation by repealing loitering/soliciting offences.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (30,584 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0