A divisionDivision No. 234 · Wednesday, 18 June 2025· Commons· Crime & Policing

Crime and Policing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 7

102Ayes
390Noes
Defeated · majority 288 · Government won
156 did not vote
Aye104No389DID NOT VOTE · 156

648 Members · Aye 102 · No 390 · DNV 156 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 18 June 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 7, a proposed addition to the Crime and Policing Bill during its Report Stage (the stage at which the full House scrutinises and amends a bill after committee). The clause was defeated heavily, with 102 voting in favour and 390 voting against. The vote concerned a proposed change to the Crime and Policing Bill, a significant piece of legislation shaping policing powers and criminal justice in England and Wales. New Clause 7 represented an alternative approach to elements of the bill, broadly associated with police reform and civil liberties considerations. Its defeat means the government's version of the bill proceeds without this addition, preserving the existing framework the government has drafted around law and order policy. The division fell largely along party lines, with Conservatives (91 votes) and Reform UK (7 votes) forming the core of the 102 Ayes, along with a small number of independents and the Democratic Unionist Party. Labour, the Liberal Democrats, and all other parties voted No, reflecting a cross-opposition alliance behind the government. There were no Labour or Liberal Democrat rebels. The result, with the government's position defeating the amendment by a margin of nearly four to one, illustrates the current government's commanding Commons majority and its ability to resist opposition amendments at Report Stage.

Voting Aye meant
Support reforming or restricting police recording of non-crime hate incidents, arguing the current system threatens free expression
Voting No meant
Oppose this change, either defending the existing NCHI framework or preferring to address the issue through other means
§ 01Who voted how.492 voting Members · 156 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
281
80
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
91
0
25
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
64
8
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
28
14
Independent
2
7
4
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Tonia AntoniazziSupportiveGower
Proposed New Clause 2 to criminalise commercial sexual exploitation by third parties, including those profiting from prostitution and operating websites with adverts.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,884 words)
Judith CumminsSupportiveBradford South
Introduced New Clause 3 to make it an offence to pay for sex, and New Clause 4 to decriminalise victims of commercial sexual exploitation by repealing loitering/soliciting offences.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (30,584 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0