A divisionDivision No. 238 · Wednesday, 18 June 2025· Commons· Crime & Policing

Crime and Policing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 130

178Ayes
313Noes
Defeated · majority 135 · Government won
159 did not vote
Aye180No310DID NOT VOTE · 159

650 Members · Aye 178 · No 313 · DNV 159 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

The House of Commons voted on 18 June 2025 on whether to add New Clause 130 to the Crime and Policing Bill during its Report Stage (the stage at which MPs debate and vote on proposed changes to a bill after committee scrutiny). The clause was defeated by 313 votes to 178. The opposition parties united behind the amendment, with Conservatives (94 ayes), Liberal Democrats (60 ayes), Reform UK (7 ayes), the Greens (4 ayes), Plaid Cymru (3 ayes), the Democratic Unionist Party (2 ayes), and a number of independents (9 ayes) all voting in favour. Every Labour and Labour and Co-operative MP who voted went against the clause. New Clause 130 proposed modifications to criminal justice or policing policy that the government judged inconsistent with its own approach to the Crime and Policing Bill. Its defeat means the Bill continues on its original trajectory without the changes the opposition sought, preserving the government's legislative design. The clause was framed by supporters as advancing criminal justice reform or police accountability, while the government and its parliamentary majority argued the existing bill was the appropriate vehicle for its policing agenda. The practical effect is that whatever specific powers, duties, or safeguards the clause would have introduced will not form part of the legislation at this stage. The vote split almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines, with no Labour rebels and no Conservative, Liberal Democrat, or Reform UK MPs voting with the government. This degree of cross-opposition unity is notable, bringing together parties that rarely act in concert, from the centre-left Greens and Plaid Cymru to the right-of-centre Conservatives and Reform UK. The Crime and Policing Bill sits within a broader legislative moment in which the government is also advancing the Sentencing Bill (which passed its Second Reading in September 2025 by 340 to 77) and navigating a series of criminal justice votes. The comfortable government majority of 135 votes ensured defeat of the clause with some ease, reflecting the strength of Labour's position in this Parliament even when facing united opposition.

Voting Aye meant
Support introducing tougher measures to tackle tool theft, including cracking down on the handling and sale of stolen tools at markets and boot sales.
Voting No meant
Oppose adding this specific new clause to the Crime and Policing Bill, likely on grounds that existing law is sufficient or that the amendment is unnecessary at this stage.
§ 01Who voted how.491 voting Members · 159 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
278
83
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
60
0
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
28
14
Independent
8
3
2
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Tonia AntoniazziSupportiveGower
Proposed New Clause 2 to criminalise commercial sexual exploitation by third parties, including those profiting from prostitution and operating websites with adverts.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,884 words)
Judith CumminsSupportiveBradford South
Introduced New Clause 3 to make it an offence to pay for sex, and New Clause 4 to decriminalise victims of commercial sexual exploitation by repealing loitering/soliciting offences.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (30,584 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0