A divisionDivision No. 238 · Wednesday, 18 June 2025· Commons· Crime & Policing

Crime and Policing Bill Report Stage: New Clause 130

178Ayes
313Noes
Defeated · majority 135 · Government won
159 did not vote
Aye180No310DID NOT VOTE · 159

650 Members · Aye 178 · No 313 · DNV 159 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 18 June 2025 on New Clause 130 to the Crime and Policing Bill, which would have made tool theft an aggravated offence carrying tougher sentences, required courts to set fines at a level covering the full replacement cost of stolen equipment and lost work, and placed a duty on local councils to produce enforcement plans targeting the sale of stolen tools at car boot sales. The clause was defeated by 313 votes to 178. The vote matters because tool theft imposes direct financial harm on tradespeople who depend on their equipment to earn a living. A Freedom of Information response cited in the debate revealed that nine in ten tool thefts over the past five years in London went unsolved, illustrating the scale of enforcement failure. The clause sought to address that gap by raising the legal consequences for thieves, ensuring fines reflected actual losses rather than nominal penalties, and requiring councils to act against boot sales where stolen tools are openly traded. Its defeat means those specific measures will not be added to the Bill. The vote divided almost entirely along government-versus-opposition lines. All 306 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted went into the No lobby, while Conservatives (94), Liberal Democrats (60), Reform UK (7), the Greens (4), Plaid Cymru (3), and the Democratic Unionist Party (2) all voted Aye. Seven independents also voted Aye and three voted No. There were no Conservative or Liberal Democrat MPs recorded in the No lobby. The result reflects the government's majority rather than any cross-party disagreement on the principle of tackling tool theft; several MPs across parties, including a Labour MP named in the debate as having campaigned on the issue, were noted as supportive of action.

Voting Aye meant
Support treating tool theft as an aggravated offence with tougher sentences, replacement-cost fines, and a council duty to crack down on stolen tools at boot sales — protecting tradespeople whose livelihoods depend on their equipment.
Voting No meant
Oppose the specific measures in New Clause 130, likely preferring the existing approach or government-led action through other means rather than legislating these particular requirements on courts and councils.
§ 01Who voted how.491 voting Members · 159 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
278
83
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
94
0
22
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
60
0
11
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
28
14
Independent
7
3
3
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
7
0
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
1
1
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Tonia AntoniazziSupportiveGower
Proposed New Clause 2 to criminalise commercial sexual exploitation by third parties, including those profiting from prostitution and operating websites with adverts.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,884 words)
Judith CumminsSupportiveBradford South
Introduced New Clause 3 to make it an offence to pay for sex, and New Clause 4 to decriminalise victims of commercial sexual exploitation by repealing loitering/soliciting offences.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (30,584 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0