Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-Sentence Reports) Bill: Amendment 4

Wednesday, 30 April 2025 · Division No. 185 · Commons

88Ayes
226Noes
Defeated

334 MPs did not vote

rightGovernment defeatedMinisterial Oversight Of Sentencing(Yes)Judicial Independence(No)Equality Before The Law(Yes)Anti Two Tier Justice(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support giving the Secretary of State power to block Sentencing Council guidelines on pre-sentence reports, ensuring ministerial accountability and preventing guidelines that could create differential treatment by ethnicity or religion

Voting No means

Oppose giving the Secretary of State a veto over Sentencing Council guidelines, preferring the government's own approach to reforming pre-sentence report guidelines without requiring explicit ministerial consent

What happened: The House of Commons voted on Amendment 4 to the Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-Sentence Reports) Bill on 30 April 2025. The amendment, which sought to expand the requirement for detailed pre-sentence reports to inform judicial sentencing decisions, was defeated by 226 votes to 88. The government opposed the amendment.

Why it matters: Pre-sentence reports are documents prepared by the Probation Service that give judges information about an offender's background, circumstances, and likelihood of reoffending before a sentence is passed. Expanding the requirement for these reports, as the amendment proposed, would have meant more offenders receiving detailed assessments before sentencing. Supporters argued this approach promotes rehabilitation and more proportionate sentencing. The government's opposition meant that the Bill would proceed without the additional mandatory reporting requirements the amendment sought to introduce, affecting how courts across England and Wales handle sentencing information.

The politics: The vote produced an unusual cross-party alignment. The Conservatives provided 81 of the 88 ayes, joined by three Reform UK MPs, two Democratic Unionist Party members, and one Traditional Unionist Voice MP. Every Labour, Labour and Co-operative, Plaid Cymru, Green, and most Independent MPs voted no, with the government's position holding firm. The scale of the defeat, 226 to 88, reflected the government's comfortable Commons majority. The Bill sits within a broader legislative environment that includes the Crime and Policing Bill and recent votes on criminal justice orders, signalling continued parliamentary activity around sentencing and offender management in this session.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/187 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
81 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/28 No
Independent
0 Aye/4 No
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/3 No
Democratic Unionist Party
2 Aye/0 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

Related Votes