Opposition Day: Sewage: Government amendment
301Ayes
69Noes
Carried · majority 232 · Government won276 did not vote
646 Members · Aye 301 · No 69 · DNV 276 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 23 April 2025, the House of Commons voted on a government amendment to an opposition day motion on sewage pollution in waterways. The government put forward its own alternative wording rather than accepting the Liberal Democrats' original motion, which had called for stronger and more immediate action on sewage discharges. The government amendment passed by 301 votes to 69. The vote determined which set of commitments Parliament placed on record regarding sewage pollution. The government's amendment reflected a more moderate approach, emphasising steps already underway such as the Water (Special Measures) Act and regulatory reforms, rather than the more demanding immediate action the Liberal Democrats sought. Water companies, environmental regulators, and communities affected by sewage discharges in rivers, lakes and coastal waters all have a stake in how firmly Parliament presses for change. The practical effect is that the government's framing of its existing programme, rather than the opposition's more urgent demands, became the agreed parliamentary position. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously for the government amendment, providing its majority, while the Liberal Democrats voted almost entirely against, with 63 of their MPs in the No lobby. A small number of independents and Reform UK members also voted No. The Ulster Unionist Party provided the sole non-Labour aye. There were no Labour rebels. This division came on the same day as a related vote in which the Liberal Democrat original motion was defeated 302 to 77, and it sits within a broader sequence of parliamentary activity on water quality that includes the passage of the Water (Special Measures) Act earlier in 2025.
Voting Aye meant
Support the government's amended version of the sewage motion, reflecting Labour's preferred framing of its record and plans on tackling sewage pollution in rivers and seas
Voting No meant
Reject the government amendment and back the original opposition motion, signalling dissatisfaction with Labour's approach to sewage and water company accountability
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
272
0
89
Conservative and Unionist Party
—
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
63
9
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
30
0
12
Independent
—
0
3
10
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
—
0
2
5
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
0
1
4
Green Party of England and Wales
—
0
0
4
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
0
0
1
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Called for radical transformation including new 'blue flag' status for rivers, stronger regulator replacing Ofwat, and potential public benefit company models for water companies; praised government's Water Act as a step but insufficient without bolder changes.Liberal Democrats · Voted no · Read full speech (4,240 words) →
Defended Water (Special Measures) Act 2025 as landmark legislation delivering tough new powers, £104bn private investment, and criminal penalties for water bosses; acknowledged inherited broken system but argued government moving decisively to reset sector through Cunliffe review.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,514 words) →
Credited Conservatives with establishing 100% storm overflow monitoring (from 7% in 2010) and Thames tideway tunnel; argued data collection is essential foundation; acknowledged more needed but criticized Labour for lack of clear plan beyond reviews and existing measures.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,659 words) →
Stated government has already delivered all three Liberal Democrat demands through the Water Act: urgent action, protection against sewage dumping, and public transparency; criticized Liberal Democrats for voting against the Act.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (732 words) →
Raised concern about Southern Water's repeated failures and proposed controversial recycled water scheme; questioned government's willingness to hold water companies truly accountable.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (147 words) →
Praised government action on River Wye and Usk, highlighting £1m joint investment with Welsh Government; credited Labour with achieving more in nine months than Conservatives in 14 years.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (564 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0