Water (Special Measures) Bill - Government motion to insist on Commons Amendment 2 and to propose Amendment (a) in lieu
331Ayes
65Noes
Carried · majority 266 · Government won250 did not vote
646 Members · Aye 331 · No 65 · DNV 250 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The Commons voted on 11 February 2025 to reject a Lords amendment to the Water (Special Measures) Bill and replace it with a government-drafted substitute. The motion passed by 331 votes to 65. This was a stage in parliamentary ping-pong, the back-and-forth process by which the two Houses resolve disagreements over a bill's text before it can become law. The vote concerns the detail of new regulatory powers over the water industry in England and Wales. The government insisted on its own version of Amendment 2 rather than the Lords' wording, arguing its substitute achieved the same policy intent in preferable terms. The bill as a whole is designed to tighten oversight of water companies, with provisions including stronger enforcement tools for regulators and measures linked to executive pay and bonuses in the sector. Labour MPs voted unanimously in favour, joined by the four Green MPs, the Democratic Unionist Party, and the smaller unionist parties. The Liberal Democrats voted solidly against, all 63 of their voting members backing the Noes, alongside all four Plaid Cymru MPs. The Conservative Party had no votes recorded in either lobby. The SNP also had no votes recorded. The Liberal Democrats have positioned themselves as critics of the government's approach to water regulation, a dynamic also visible in a related Opposition Day debate on sewage in April 2025, where they pressed their own motion against the government.
Voting Aye meant
Support the government's preferred version of the amendment over the Lords' change, backing the Labour government's approach to water industry reform
Voting No meant
Prefer the Lords' original amendment over the government's substitute, or oppose the government's handling of water regulation legislation
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
285
0
76
Conservative and Unionist Party
—
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
62
9
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
32
0
10
Independent
—
6
1
7
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
—
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government minister defending amendments to introduce financial reporting requirements and rejecting statutory instrument approval process for Ofwat rules to avoid delay and protect regulator independence.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,104 words) →
Acknowledges Government concessions on transparency but criticises lack of full accountability mechanisms; ultimately supports Bill to prevent failure despite wanting stronger oversight powers.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,656 words) →
Welcomes financial reporting amendment but advocates for much more radical reform including stricter bonus controls and replacement of Ofwat with a clean water authority; pushes for six-month advance notice of bonuses.Liberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (2,162 words) →
Questions whether Ofwat will actually enforce debt level limits despite having powers; seeks assurance amendment includes enforcement mechanisms.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (83 words) →
Defends importance of Ofwat's independence and notes Bill's bonus ban represents Government progress compared to previous Conservative inaction.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (90 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0