Water (Special Measures) Bill Report Stage: New Clause 19

Tuesday, 28 January 2025 · Division No. 94 · Commons

180Ayes
325Noes
Defeated

143 MPs did not vote

cross-cuttingGovernment defeatedPro Water Company Accountability(Yes)Pro Consumer Bill Protection(Yes)Anti Utility Customer Burden(Yes)Pro Regulatory Flexibility(No)

Voting Yes means

Support requiring that fines imposed on water companies lead to equivalent reductions in customers' bills, protecting bill payers from bearing the cost of water company wrongdoing

Voting No means

Oppose this specific mechanism for bill reductions, preferring the government retains flexibility in how penalties are applied and how customer interests are protected

Parliament voted on 28 January 2025 on New Clause 19 to the Water (Special Measures) Bill, a proposal to add stronger enforcement mechanisms or penalties for water companies beyond what the government had already included in the legislation. The motion was defeated by 325 votes to 180. Labour MPs voted overwhelmingly against, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, and several smaller parties supported the new clause.

The vote concerned whether to expand the regulatory powers available to address water company misconduct. Those backing the new clause argued that the existing provisions in the Bill lacked sufficient teeth to compel water companies to change their behaviour, pointing to ongoing sewage discharges and what they described as inadequate penalties. The government's position was that the Bill as drafted provided a proportionate and workable framework, and that adding further enforcement powers at this stage was unnecessary. The result means the Bill will proceed without the additional measures proposed in New Clause 19.

The division produced an unusual cross-party coalition in favour of the new clause. All 97 voting Conservatives, all 61 voting Liberal Democrats, all four Plaid Cymru MPs, all four DUP members, all four Reform UK MPs, and the single voting Ulster Unionist supported it, alongside eight independents. Labour, including its Co-operative Party members, voted unanimously against, providing the government's winning margin. The vote sits within a broader legislative debate over how far the Water (Special Measures) Bill should go, with opposition parties and some government critics arguing the Bill is too modest and the government maintaining it represents a significant first step.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/289 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
97 Aye/0 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
61 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/31 No
Independent
8 Aye/2 No
Reform UKWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Plaid CymruWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/3 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Tim Farron

Liberal Democrat · Westmorland and Lonsdale

Opposed

Criticizing both regulation and the privatisation model, pushing for Ofwat abolition (New Clause 2), creditor liability (Amendment 9), tighter pollution targets (New Clause 25), and better monitoring tools for campaigners.

Voted Aye

Clive Lewis

Labour · Norwich South

Opposed

Arguing that England's privatised water model is failing and that investors and creditors, not consumers, should bear costs of company failures, while suggesting alternative public ownership models.

Voted No

Graham Stuart

Conservative · Beverley and Holderness

Opposed

Pressing the government to accept New Clause 16 on the water restoration fund, emphasizing that fines should fund environmental recovery rather than Treasury coffers.

Voted Aye

Dr Neil Hudson

Conservative · Epping Forest

Questioning

Opposition spokesperson supporting the Bill's intent but pressing for New Clause 16 (water restoration fund ringfencing), New Clause 17 (borrowing limits), and amendments preventing non-service-user bill increases in special administration.

Voted Aye

Emma Hardy

Labour · Kingston upon Hull West and Haltemprice

Supportive

Government minister defending the Bill's progress, welcoming New Clause 18 on water poverty, and committing to address environmental and consumer concerns through regulation and secondary legislation.

Voted No

Catherine Fookes

Labour · Monmouthshire

Supportive

Defending the Bill as a strong first step after Conservative inaction, praising progress on criminal charges and cost recovery, and rejecting Liberal Democrat amendments as overreach.

Voted No

Joy Morrissey

Conservative · Beaconsfield

Supportive

Supporting amendments 2 and 3 to criminalise failure to report emergency overflows and prohibit discharges in aquatic sports areas.

Voted Aye

Related Votes