Water (Special Measures) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 9
73Ayes
321Noes
Defeated · majority 248 · Government won253 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 73 · No 321 · DNV 253 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The House of Commons voted on Amendment 9 to the Water (Special Measures) Bill during its Report Stage on 28 January 2025. The amendment, which sought to strengthen regulatory accountability for water companies, was defeated by 321 votes to 73. The government opposed the amendment and its position prevailed comfortably. The Water (Special Measures) Bill is the government's primary legislative vehicle for tightening oversight of England's privatised water industry, which has faced sustained criticism over sewage discharges, executive pay and mounting debt. Amendment 9 would have gone further than the government's own provisions in holding water companies to account. Its defeat means the Bill proceeds broadly on the government's preferred terms, without the additional regulatory measures the amendment's supporters argued were necessary to produce meaningful change for bill payers, swimmers, and river users across England and Wales. The amendment was supported by 73 MPs drawn mainly from the Liberal Democrats (61 votes), alongside several Independents, the Democratic Unionist Party, the Greens, and smaller unionist parties. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against, providing the 321 noes that defeated it. There were no notable Labour rebels. The Liberal Democrats have positioned themselves as the lead parliamentary voice for tougher water regulation, tabling 34 amendments at Report Stage alone. The vote reflects a recurring pattern in this Bill's passage, with the government rejecting cross-party attempts to go beyond its chosen approach while insisting that its own provisions already represent a significant step forward.
Voting Aye meant
Support tougher regulation of water companies, including ringfencing financial penalties into a fund dedicated to restoring freshwater quality, going further than the government's bill
Voting No meant
Oppose the Lib Dem amendment, backing the government's existing Water (Special Measures) Bill as sufficient without adding further requirements
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
287
74
Conservative and Unionist Party
—
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
61
0
11
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
31
11
Independent
—
5
2
7
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
—
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government minister defending the Bill's progress, welcoming New Clause 18 on water poverty, and committing to address environmental and consumer concerns through regulation and secondary legislation.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (3,849 words) →
Opposition spokesperson supporting the Bill's intent but pressing for New Clause 16 (water restoration fund ringfencing), New Clause 17 (borrowing limits), and amendments preventing non-service-user bill increases in special administration.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,448 words) →
Criticizing both regulation and the privatisation model, pushing for Ofwat abolition (New Clause 2), creditor liability (Amendment 9), tighter pollution targets (New Clause 25), and better monitoring tools for campaigners.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,124 words) →
Arguing that England's privatised water model is failing and that investors and creditors, not consumers, should bear costs of company failures, while suggesting alternative public ownership models.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (884 words) →
Defending the Bill as a strong first step after Conservative inaction, praising progress on criminal charges and cost recovery, and rejecting Liberal Democrat amendments as overreach.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (831 words) →
Supporting amendments 2 and 3 to criminalise failure to report emergency overflows and prohibit discharges in aquatic sports areas.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (716 words) →
Pressing the government to accept New Clause 16 on the water restoration fund, emphasizing that fines should fund environmental recovery rather than Treasury coffers.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (376 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0