Water (Special Measures) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 9

Tuesday, 28 January 2025 · Division No. 95 · Commons

73Ayes
321Noes
Defeated

253 MPs did not vote

leftGovernment defeatedPro Environment(Yes)Pro Water Regulation(Yes)Anti Corporate Excess(Yes)Pro Polluter Pays(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support tougher regulation of water companies, including ringfencing financial penalties into a fund dedicated to restoring freshwater quality, going further than the government's bill

Voting No means

Oppose the Lib Dem amendment, backing the government's existing Water (Special Measures) Bill as sufficient without adding further requirements

What happened: The House of Commons voted on Amendment 9 to the Water (Special Measures) Bill during its Report Stage on 28 January 2025. The amendment, which sought to strengthen regulatory accountability for water companies, was defeated by 321 votes to 73. The government opposed the amendment and its position prevailed comfortably.

Why it matters: The Water (Special Measures) Bill is the government's primary legislative vehicle for tightening oversight of England's privatised water industry, which has faced sustained criticism over sewage discharges, executive pay and mounting debt. Amendment 9 would have gone further than the government's own provisions in holding water companies to account. Its defeat means the Bill proceeds broadly on the government's preferred terms, without the additional regulatory measures the amendment's supporters argued were necessary to produce meaningful change for bill payers, swimmers, and river users across England and Wales.

The politics: The amendment was supported by 73 MPs drawn mainly from the Liberal Democrats (61 votes), alongside several Independents, the Democratic Unionist Party, the Greens, and smaller unionist parties. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously against, providing the 321 noes that defeated it. There were no notable Labour rebels. The Liberal Democrats have positioned themselves as the lead parliamentary voice for tougher water regulation, tabling 34 amendments at Report Stage alone. The vote reflects a recurring pattern in this Bill's passage, with the government rejecting cross-party attempts to go beyond its chosen approach while insisting that its own provisions already represent a significant step forward.

How They Voted

Government position: No

Labour PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/287 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped Aye
61 Aye/0 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/31 No
Independent
5 Aye/2 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
0 Aye/1 No

What They Said in the Debate

Tim Farron

Liberal Democrat · Westmorland and Lonsdale

Opposed

Criticizing both regulation and the privatisation model, pushing for Ofwat abolition (New Clause 2), creditor liability (Amendment 9), tighter pollution targets (New Clause 25), and better monitoring tools for campaigners.

Voted Aye

Clive Lewis

Labour · Norwich South

Opposed

Arguing that England's privatised water model is failing and that investors and creditors, not consumers, should bear costs of company failures, while suggesting alternative public ownership models.

Voted No

Graham Stuart

Conservative · Beverley and Holderness

Opposed

Pressing the government to accept New Clause 16 on the water restoration fund, emphasizing that fines should fund environmental recovery rather than Treasury coffers.

Dr Neil Hudson

Conservative · Epping Forest

Questioning

Opposition spokesperson supporting the Bill's intent but pressing for New Clause 16 (water restoration fund ringfencing), New Clause 17 (borrowing limits), and amendments preventing non-service-user bill increases in special administration.

Emma Hardy

Labour · Kingston upon Hull West and Haltemprice

Supportive

Government minister defending the Bill's progress, welcoming New Clause 18 on water poverty, and committing to address environmental and consumer concerns through regulation and secondary legislation.

Voted No

Catherine Fookes

Labour · Monmouthshire

Supportive

Defending the Bill as a strong first step after Conservative inaction, praising progress on criminal charges and cost recovery, and rejecting Liberal Democrat amendments as overreach.

Voted No

Joy Morrissey

Conservative · Beaconsfield

Supportive

Supporting amendments 2 and 3 to criminalise failure to report emergency overflows and prohibit discharges in aquatic sports areas.

Related Votes