A divisionDivision No. 82 · Wednesday, 15 January 2025· Commons· Energy

Draft Clean Heat Market Mechanism Regulations 2024

424Ayes
109Noes
Carried · majority 315 · Government won
117 did not vote
Aye423No109DID NOT VOTE · 117

650 Members · Aye 424 · No 109 · DNV 117 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament approved the Draft Clean Heat Market Mechanism Regulations 2024 on 15 January 2025 by 424 votes to 109. The regulations require gas boiler manufacturers to sell a minimum proportion of heat pumps each year, with financial penalties applied to those who sell more gas boilers than their permitted quota. The regulations form part of the government's broader "warm home plan" and push manufacturers toward low-carbon heating alternatives rather than compelling consumers to install heat pumps directly. Supporters argued the scheme would reduce household dependence on fossil fuel heating, cut energy bills over time, and strengthen energy security. Critics argued the fines imposed on manufacturers would be passed on to consumers buying gas boilers, making them more expensive for households that have not chosen to switch. The vote divided sharply along party lines. Labour, Labour and Co-operative, Liberal Democrat, SNP, Plaid Cymru, and Green MPs all voted in favour. Conservative and Reform UK MPs voted against, as did the Democratic Unionist Party. One independent MP voted no while seven voted aye. There were no notable cross-party rebellions. The debate carried a pointed political edge: the minister, Miatta Fahnbulleh, quoted the Conservative shadow minister's own words from a 2023 committee endorsing a market-based clean heat mechanism, arguing the Opposition's current position contradicted its previous stance.

Voting Aye meant
Support the Clean Heat Market Mechanism, backing a market-based scheme that pushes manufacturers toward heat pumps as part of the transition away of fossil fuel heating and to reduce household energy bills long-term.
Voting No meant
Oppose the regulations, arguing they will push up the cost of gas boilers for consumers through manufacturer fines, and that the government is forcing an unwanted technology transition on households.
§ 01Who voted how.533 voting Members · 117 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
310
0
51
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
95
21
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
50
0
21
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
37
0
5
Independent
8
1
5
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
7
0
2
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
6
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
2
0
0
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
1
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.3 principal speakers
Miatta FahnbullehSupportivePeckham
Supports the regulations as a reformed scheme providing stability to manufacturers while protecting consumers; emphasises partnership with industry and rejection of compulsion, positioning heat pumps as three times more efficient and attractive to households.Labour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,412 words)
Andrew BowieOpposedWest Aberdeenshire and Kincardine
Opposes the regulations as a hidden 'boiler tax' that will punish consumers and raise costs for vulnerable families, particularly those in unsuitable homes; argues the Government is replacing a boiler ban with a boiler tax despite higher electricity costs under Labour's policies.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (1,735 words)
Tom CollinsSupportiveWorcester
Welcomes the fresh approach of partnership with industry and the Government's ambition for clean, dependable, affordable energy; criticises Conservative flip-flopping and supports the regulations as part of the heating transition journey.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (325 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0