A divisionDivision No. 80 · Wednesday, 15 January 2025· Commons· Energy

Draft Electricity Capacity Mechanism (Amendment) Regulations 2024

418Ayes
78Noes
Carried · majority 340 · Government won
154 did not vote
Aye417No78DID NOT VOTE · 154

650 Members · Aye 418 · No 78 · DNV 154 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament approved technical changes to Britain's electricity capacity market on 15 January 2025, passing the Draft Electricity Capacity Mechanism (Amendment) Regulations 2024 by 418 votes to 78. The regulations remove a requirement inherited from EU rules that had subjected the capacity market scheme to a 10-year approval process, allowing the scheme to continue operating outside the EU regulatory framework. The capacity market, introduced in 2014, is the government's main tool for ensuring enough electricity is available to meet peak demand. It does this by paying generators, storage operators and other providers to guarantee their capacity will be available when needed. Removing the EU-derived 10-year approval requirement allows the scheme to function more flexibly under the post-Brexit regulatory settlement, with no substantive change to how the market itself operates in practice. The vote divided largely along government and opposition lines. Labour, the Liberal Democrats and most smaller parties voted in favour. Sixty-four Conservatives, six Reform UK members and five Democratic Unionist Party MPs voted against. Notably, the Conservative shadow minister, Andrew Bowie, explicitly declined to oppose the measure in debate, describing it as sensible; the Conservative no votes therefore reflect a party split between the front bench position and backbench opposition. No substantive arguments against the regulations were made in the committee debate.

Voting Aye meant
Support updating the electricity capacity market rules to remove outdated EU-derived requirements, ensuring security of electricity supply
Voting No meant
Oppose the updated capacity market regulations, though in practice no substantive opposition was voiced in debate
§ 01Who voted how.496 voting Members · 154 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
310
0
51
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
1
64
51
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
50
0
21
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
37
0
5
Independent
8
1
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
6
1
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
2
0
0
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
1
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Michael ShanksSupportiveRutherglen
Supports the amendment regulations as necessary to remove outdated EU approval requirements and maintain security of electricity supply through the continued operation of the capacity market.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (921 words)
Andrew BowieSupportiveWest Aberdeenshire and Kincardine
Supports the regulations as sensible removal of the 10-year approval requirement, but uses the debate to emphasize the need for retained gas capacity and criticize the government's 'renewables at any cost' approach.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (581 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0