The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,749 contributions

Speeches by Pennycook.

Every Hansard contribution by Matthew Pennycook this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 1,0411,060 of 1,749 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 53 of 88Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Fifth sitting)

I am more than happy to write to the shadow Minister about the role of county authorities in managing the highway network, and how the Highways Act and the consenting regime applies to them. I do not think his point is pertinent in this respect, in the sense that the clause transfers administrative functions related to

energyenvironmentlocal-government
130
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

Let me first say that, for entirely understandable reasons, this has been a passionate debate. People feel very strongly about the local planning system, the role of elected members in it, and the role of residents in inputting to those decisions. That is because local planning is principally a local activity. It is fo

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
433
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

That is a separate argument, but the hon. Gentleman cannot pray in aid the case that he has just cited, which was made on the basis of a national scheme of delegation not being in operation, and where his local residents just took issue with national policy and guidance, which he thinks should be in place. He has recog

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
141
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

We were discussing clause 36 and I was attempting to reassure the shadow Minister, the hon. Member for Hamble Valley, that his concerns were unfounded. We were discussing fees charged by particular public bodies for providing services associated with Transport and Works Act 1992 orders. As I made clear, the power is su

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
327
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

The purpose of clause 37 is to remove the need for Transport and Works Act order applicants to apply to multiple consenting authorities for separate authorisation requirements under relevant heritage regimes in England and Wales, such as listed buildings and scheduled monument consents. Instead, the clause provides for

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
344
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

I appreciate the comments from the Liberal Democrat spokesman, the hon. Member for Taunton and Wellington, and the shadow Minister, the hon. Member for Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner. Let me go over some of the points I have made to reinforce them, but also to respond directly to the challenges raised. I think the princ

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
160
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

I thank the hon. Gentleman for that point. We will certainly go away and reflect, because it is broadly our intention to ensure that the Transport and Works Act is brought into line with other consenting regimes, not least the Planning Act regime and how that operates in respect of some of these protections. I commit t

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
139
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

Clause 38 allows Transport and Works Act orders to include a deemed marine licence for projects in UK waters, where a separate authorisation is currently required. That removes the need for a separate application to the Marine Management Organisation, or MMO. It allows for a single process, again similar to the Plannin

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
156
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

I can provide the hon. Gentleman with that assurance. In terms of enforcement, I assure the hon. Gentleman that if consent is granted under the Transport and Works Act, any breaches of marine licence will continue to be dealt with by the Marine Management Organisation. Question put and agreed to. Clause 38 accordingly

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
78
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

Clause 39 removes the requirement that exists at present for a second local authority resolution after submitting a Transport and Works Act application, making the process faster and simpler. Currently, local authorities must achieve a majority vote from their local authority members both before and after submission of

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
97
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

I refer back to my point: the hon. Gentleman may take the view, which is a perfectly coherent and respectable view, that a national scheme of delegation is wrong in principle. That is not the Government’s view, because we think there are significant advantages to be had from introducing greater consistency and certaint

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
70
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

It does, and we think that is right. We think we should trust and empower expert planning officers. The appeals process will remain in force. I recognise the scenario the hon. Gentleman outlines. Local planning officers do not get every decision right. To gently challenge him, he is making the case for no scheme of del

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
262
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

A number of points here are worth pulling out. We have just discussed on mandatory training the need to ensure that all elected members across the country who serve on committees are cognisant of planning law and other considerations to which they must adhere. I would gently press back. We know there are instances wher

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
136
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

As I have set out, the Government recognise the vital role that planning committees play in ensuring that decisions about what to build and where are shaped by local communities and reflect the views of local residents. Under local government law, local authority planning decisions must be a committee function, not an

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
400
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

I beg to move amendment 50, in clause 46, page 61, line 39, at end insert— “(7) Sections 319ZZC and 319ZZD and this section apply in relation to a relevant planning function conferred on a relevant mineral planning authority as if references to a relevant local planning authority were to a relevant mineral planning aut

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
94
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

The hon. Member understandably tempts me to start to specify what will be in the training, but I will not do that. Further details will be brought forward in due course, but I have certainly heard the case made by Committee members about what the training should include in respect of accessibility and other issues. Fin

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
190
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

What is there to say to that? In no way did I imply that the Mayor of London requires planning training—I think he has had extensive planning training—but the training requirement set out in this clause will apply to him, because he acts as a local planning authority in respect of applications of potential strategic im

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
497
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

We have had a huge amount of engagement with the sector, both in working up the proposals and in the feedback that we have received to the planning reform working paper. The hon. Gentleman will also be aware of the Planning Advisory Service that already provides local authorities with support, and there are other organ

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
132
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

That is a fair and reasonable point. If the hon. Gentleman will allow me, I will write to him to set out the Government’s thinking on that issue. If it is available—I fully expect that it will be— I will give him some sense of the level of refusals on appeal for decisions made by committees versus decisions made by exp

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
243
12 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Sixth sitting)

I thank the shadow Minister for that point. In no way am I implying that in a committee meeting, the process of putting hands up on another vote is itself onerous. What are onerous are the delays that can be caused by the need simply to reaffirm a vote that has already taken place. The Government think this is a simple

housinglocal-governmentenvironment
192
← PreviousPage 53 of 88 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.