Speeches by Pennycook.
Every Hansard contribution by Matthew Pennycook this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 1,061–1,080 of 1,934 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eleventh sitting) “I will come back to the hon. Member on that point in writing, because it is important that I am precise on it. Obviously a series of obligations stem from the trade and co-operation agreement, and they are set out. This clause specifically attempts to ensure that the new system of EORs—legislated for through the Levell…” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 99 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eleventh sitting) “In speaking to the clause, I stressed that the purpose is to ensure that the new system of environmental outcomes reports introduced by the Levelling-up and Regeneration Act, which this Government are committed to proceeding with, is compliant with all our international obligations. I mentioned, for example, the Espoo …” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 115 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time. At present, we know that it is taking too long for promoters of nationally significant infrastructure projects to prepare applications for development consent that are robust and ready for examination. Part of the reason is the time it is taking for promoters to gai…” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 338 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “I appreciate the reasons why the hon. Gentleman has raised those points; I have a couple of points that may provide him with reassurance. The provisions in section 53 will allow authorised persons to carry out surveys required in connection with the preparation of environmental assessments and habitats assessments. The…” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 281 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time. New clause 43 will make the process for post-consent changes to development consent orders more proportionate to the change requested. That will allow greater flexibility than the existing binary process. The current change process takes too long to deliver on the g…” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 426 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “I appreciate hon. Members speaking to these new clauses. I recognise the worthy intentions that sit behind many of them. The Government certainly recognise the challenges of many of the issues that they touch on. It will not surprise Members that the Government will not be able to accept them, but I hope I can set out …” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 413 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eleventh sitting) “We value the hon. Gentleman’s expertise and insight. I would say two things. It is worth clarifying—apologies if I gave the impression otherwise—that it is for the upper tribunal to determine compensation cases, but I reassure the Opposition that when it comes to inspectors and their role in the CPO process, they have …” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 159 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “My hon. Friend is right. If we are having a mature conversation about this, we have to recognise that economic circumstances can change and that the costs that developers are having to deal with—build material costs have increased significantly, particularly in London—are factors they do have to weigh in their judgment…” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 97 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “I will, but I do not want to lead us down the path of a long debate on viability.” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 19 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “The hon. Member tempts me into commenting on hypotheticals. I will instead say the following. There are two things happening here. We have to be aware of the ability for some existing mechanisms—section 73 applications are a good example—to be gamed in terms of viability to drive down the amount of public gain. I am aw…” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 552 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “What I can commit to—I feel the glares from my officials on me now—is this. If we have the information, I am more than happy to have a conversation with the shadow Minister to give him a sense of, across the country, how local authorities are using their existing enforcement powers and the extent to which, although I t…” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 118 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “I think some of this will become evident in the fullness of time. There has been an implicit criticism of the Government at several points in Committee that we are entirely reliant on a market-led approach, and are happy with an entirely developer-led, market-led approach. That is not the case. We think that targeted r…” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 126 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “Well, the market does need to be disrupted, in the particular sense that we need new entrants coming forward, and small and medium-sized enterprises and community led-housing back in the game. The hon. Member for Taunton and Wellington said, and I think he is right, that developers have a business model, particularly v…” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 206 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “That is a good point. To wrap this debate up, I think it is right that the Government seek to take forward planning reform in the way we have, and to streamline the planning process in a way that drops costs on developers where it is appropriate. Equally, we must be robust with developers. We want to put this mechanism…” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 137 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “New clause 2, which the hon. Lady has just spoken to, was tabled by my hon. Friend the Member for North East Hertfordshire. The purpose of the planning system is clear: to contribute to the achievement of sustainable development. The UN’s sustainable development goals are important to that. It is because of their impor…” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 496 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “My hon. Friend has a quote.” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 6 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “I will obey your strictures, Ms Jardine, and avoid a debate on Help to Buy. I welcome hon. Members moving this group of new clauses, but I will be fairly brief. Although they may not want to, I am keen to debate all the other new clauses they have tabled and to make good progress through them. However, I am more than h…” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 905 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “The hon. Gentleman makes a fair point. Local plans are set over a longer time horizon. There is an issue, as he knows, with the number of local plans across the country that are up to date. There are other, corresponding issues about the date at which those local plans that are brought forward begin, and whether they a…” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 213 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “The hon. Gentleman’s position on the matter is very clear. We will keep under review how the taskforce’s recommendations on new towns interact with housing targets. Although I appreciate that the hon. Member for Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner is seeking, understandably, to prevent areas with a new town from taking unmet…” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 926 |
| 19 May 2025 | Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Twelfth sitting) “It is worth referring to the NPPF consultation in the summer and the Government response. We think that there was good reason not to make the 10% allocation mandatory. Local authorities, in particular, told us that they had concerns in that regard. There are many other things we could do. Without using this as a defenc…” housinglocal-governmenteconomy-jobs | 674 |