The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,749 contributions

Speeches by Pennycook.

Every Hansard contribution by Matthew Pennycook this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 1,0211,040 of 1,749 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 52 of 88Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

I say it once again for the record: I have understood the hon. Lady’s point. I will reflect on it, in the spirit of this Committee as a whole. I have sought to take points away when they are well made, and to give them further consideration.

housingenvironmentlocal-government
47
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

I thank my hon. Friend for making that point. It is only seven days. The hon. Member for North Herefordshire might expect Government to move quicker than they do, but they do not. It is right that we take time to reflect properly on whether the Government agree that some of the points the OEP has made are valid—we are

housingenvironmentlocal-government
94
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

I do not think I could have been any clearer that the Government are reflecting on the OEP’s letter and the points it has set out. I will not issue the Government response to that letter today in Committee; I am setting out the Government’s position on the Bill as it stands, but we will reflect on those concerns. If we

housingenvironmentlocal-government
341
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

I will intervene in the interest of trying to bring this discussion to a close, because I feel I have outlined the Government’s position in quite some detail. I have understood the points that Opposition Members have made. I have committed to reflecting on them. I have also committed to writing to the Committee, which

housingenvironmentlocal-government
174
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

It is worth reading the OEP’s letter in full. It broadly welcomes the overall thrust of the Bill in this area. We will reflect on and respond to the concerns it has highlighted. We want to ensure there is confidence that this part of the Bill can deliver on those objectives—that win-win for nature. If the hon. Lady wil

housingenvironmentlocal-government
231
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

I recognise that the amendment is a constructive attempt to highlight an issue that the OEP highlighted to us. I make the broad point again: we are carefully considering the advice from the Office for Environmental Protection and will continue to work with the sector and parliamentarians to deliver on the intent of the

housingenvironmentlocal-government
150
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

I understand the shadow Minister’s point, and I will offer to write to him. His point about the sequencing of an EDP and the conservation measures that it would give rise to is valid. How can we essentially, through the fee and charging schedule process, ensure that those measures can be carried out on the basis of tha

housingenvironmentlocal-government
505
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

In establishing this new approach, we recognise the need to ensure that developers have clarity around the required levels of contributions to benefit from an environmental delivery plan. This transparency will ensure that developers can factor in the cost of the levy, should they choose to use the EDP. Clause 51 estab

housingenvironmentlocal-government
205
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

Indeed. I look forward to seeing how Hansard tidies up that exchange. As the shadow Minister said, amendment 148 would prevent chalk streams and blanket bogs from being an environmental feature for which conservation measures can be put in place that address the harm from development at a different location from the im

housingenvironmentlocal-government
533
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

In that case, I will sit down.

housingenvironmentlocal-government
7
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

I will continue then and turn to amendment 148.

housingenvironmentlocal-government
9
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

If the hon. Lady wants to intervene, she is more than welcome to.

housingenvironmentlocal-government
13
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

Before I start, let me make a point that I think has been well conveyed, but that I will make again for the sake of clarity: I hope that Opposition Members who have dealt with me in the past know this, but when I say that I am reflecting and listening, I am. I will take all the comments about these clauses away. As I s

housingenvironmentlocal-government
781
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

The hon. Gentleman is more than welcome to come back to me on that point, but we will deal with the mechanism by which fees are set under the EDPs in a later clause. I hope that, at that point, I will provide him with more clarity, but perhaps we could defer that particular discussion, because I think it would be more

housingenvironmentlocal-government
88
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

Excellent. I wanted to make sure, given previous confusion on other clauses. Before I speak to clauses 48 and 49 and respond to the points made, I hope you will indulge me slightly, Mrs Hobhouse, as I take a few moments to set out the Government’s overriding objections to amending this really important part of the Bill

housingenvironmentlocal-government
284
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

Did we hear about the other amendment, Mrs Hobhouse?

housingenvironmentlocal-government
9
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

I will start by responding to amendment 124 moved by the hon Member for Taunton and Wellington. I will then speak to clause 47 stand part, Government amendment 48 and schedule 3. In reference to amendment 124, it is true that, unlike local plans, which must be reviewed at least every five years, there is no set timesca

housingenvironmentlocal-government
795
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

I thank the hon. Gentleman for clearly setting out his intent. Again, I preface my remarks by saying that, given the strength of feeling that has been expressed this afternoon, I will certainly reflect. As a point of principle—I will repeat this clearly, so that it is on the record—the Government of course want local c

housingenvironmentlocal-government
444
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

I did not teach the subject, so I do not know. I am content to be schooled by the hon. Member for North Herefordshire on the philosophical meaning of a consultation versus notification. As I read it, the relevant strategic planning authority has a duty to produce and then publish a draft SDS, and they are required to n

housingenvironmentlocal-government
197
13 May 2025Planning and Infrastructure Bill (Eighth sitting)

I come back to the point I have made several times now: SDSs cannot allocate sites. There is a role for local plans underneath SDSs, which must be in general conformity with them. We would have failed if we simply ensured that SDSs were big local plans with the level of detail required on site allocation for a local pl

housingenvironmentlocal-government
197
← PreviousPage 52 of 88 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.