The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,057 contributions

Speeches by Mullan.

Every Hansard contribution by Kieran Mullan this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 441460 of 1,057 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 23 of 53Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I did raise an eyebrow at the level of evidence that the individual from the CPS chose to give in relation to commenting on Government policy in that way. I have spoken to previous Justice Ministers, and that was unprecedented. Again, if we want to give validity to its views, can Government Members point to a single ti

crimeeconomy-jobs
160
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Yes, and I will be writing to the CPS about that, because commenting in the way that it has was extremely unusual. I would hope that it has a very clear explanation as to how it has been able to formulate that position, because, of course, the CPS is just articulating a particular viewpoint. As has happened, when a Gov

crimeeconomy-jobs
2,173
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Yes, absolutely, which is why I said earlier that I regret some of the changes undertaken while we were in government. I have made it very clear that justice and all the issues we are debating are a real political priority for me. That is why, in large part, I wanted to become an MP. Members will rarely hear me disagre

crimeeconomy-jobs
200
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Those aspects link directly, because I am discussing particular disclosure issues occurring in the magistrates court. As I will go on to explain, these are specific problems that Jonathan Fisher has identified as being a particular problem in the magistrates court rather than the Crown court—yet we are going to send mo

crimeeconomy-jobs
288
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Sometimes I wish that Government Members would pay more attention to what is being said. I mentioned “some” cases and “some” of these people. That is the difference in how we tackle these issues. We do not get up and talk about “every victim” and I specifically did not say that. I went out of my way to say that among h

crimeeconomy-jobs
380
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Clearly, if new receipts into the Crown court are coming down, we will not immediately see a reduction in the backlogs—we need time for the trials to come down. I am glad that the Minister has admitted that new receipts are coming down, because that is an extremely important insight into whether the backlogs themselves

crimeeconomy-jobs
85
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

As we heard from the Criminal Bar Association and others during the evidence sessions, we do not accept that the Government have sufficiently justified that modelling. Modelling is not perfect, and the IFG could not be clearer that the modelling used to justify the Government’s case, as the Minister has just done, is b

crimeeconomy-jobs
100
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Let me think of a directly relevant example that shows just how important and meaningful that distinction is, in a way that the Minister is seeking to blur. We all follow political polls that are based on models. Those models are probably all sound, but they are all different and produce completely different results ba

crimeeconomy-jobs
718
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I do not think I am being the least bit unfair. I did not even ask the Minister to give a list or specifics; I just asked whether the statistics were going down in some parts of the country. That is a very broad and open question. I am flabbergasted that the Minister did not know whether things were improving, given th

crimeeconomy-jobs
579
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I thank the Minister for explaining the measures as she understands them. I do not mind admitting that some of the explanations in the explanatory notes and the information from the Library have left us with questions about how the measure will operate. The clause refers to written indication of guilty plea, and the ex

crimeeconomy-jobs
640
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I do. In the other direction, the Institute for Government highlights that “only around 30% of sentences of 6-12 months were handed out by magistrates” since their sentencing powers increased from six months to 12 months. That indicates a hesitation in the magistrates courts to award higher sentences. If the Government

crimeeconomy-jobs
257
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

The point was made very powerfully in the evidence sessions that we have this idea that we have to take a lot of time to explain all this complex stuff to a jury, and that we can just skip through it in a rapid way with a judge. I visited courts and spoke to judges when I was on the Justice Committee. They themselves a

crimeeconomy-jobs
245
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

What does not bear up to much scrutiny is for the Minister to say, “Actually, the package as a whole will deliver these major reforms,” because we do not object to the whole package. We can say, “Go ahead and do the things that we do not object to, and we will have violent agreement at later stages in the Bill.” The Go

crimeeconomy-jobs
134
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I covered all the statistics on the reforms that the hon. Member for Rugby mentioned this morning. The scale of these changes, compared with the scale of those changes, is absolutely unprecedented. There has never been a reduction in jury trials of the scale before us today. In support of the point being made by my hon

crimeeconomy-jobs
105
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

rose—

crimeeconomy-jobs
1
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

It would assist the Committee to know why we are making these comparisons. I have figures on the effect of the reclassification of criminal offences in the Criminal Justice Act 1988, which is one of the examples that the hon. Member for Rugby used in order to say that we are unfairly comparing the categorisations. Let

crimeeconomy-jobs
152
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

On a point of order, Ms Butler. This speaks to the heart of the confusion at the start of the debate. On the one hand, the Minister wants to say that it is arbitrary and inconsequential, but the explanatory notes say that this is fundamental to enacting clause 1. That is what the Minister said—that these two things sit

crimeeconomy-jobs
86
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Reflecting on what has been said, I think that confusion remains. I welcome the further remarks from the Minister, but I am still not clear on whether there will be any impact in the real world for people as a result of the change. Earlier, I read out a sentence from the explanatory notes that talks about how the claus

crimeeconomy-jobs
1,167
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

My final point in opposition to clauses 1 and 2 is that the hon. Member for Kingston upon Hull East (Karl Turner), who is not here today, would have had a lot to say during our proceedings. He is a Labour MP who has quite literally never rebelled against the Labour Whip. Ms Butler, you have probably been here longer th

crimeeconomy-jobs
143
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I am not clear that that is the case.

crimeeconomy-jobs
9
← PreviousPage 23 of 53 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.