The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,057 contributions

Speeches by Mullan.

Every Hansard contribution by Kieran Mullan this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 421440 of 1,057 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 22 of 53Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

rose—

crime
1
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

The Minister is an extremely articulate individual. Will she just confirm that she agrees that, as the hon. Member for Brighton Pavilion pointed out, the Government are abolishing the right to elect, so it is perfectly reasonable for individuals to use the term “abolish” in relation to some of these reforms—because the

crime
58
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

Will the Minister give way?

crime
5
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

Will the Minister give way?

crime
5
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

rose—

crime
1
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

I wish to pick up on a point the Minister made earlier, as interventions from other Members hampered me from doing so at the time. She hinted in her earlier remarks that although the total backlog is rising, there have been some improvements. I wonder whether she was attempting to address my questions around the Crimin

crime
105
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

I think even though the Minister did not directly and clearly say it, there was an acceptance there that the backlog is falling in a number of areas. A question that flows from that: what analysis has been done on why? I imagine this is something that the Ministry of Justice is all over like a rash. It is having to do

crime
149
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

Will the Minister give way?

crime
5
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

Will the Minister give way?

crime
5
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

The Minister is to some extent varying her argument. Earlier in the debate, she accepted that these things are a matter of gravity and of weighing up, and inherent in saying that is that the Minister must accept that there are less and more fair ways of doing things. The point the Minister is now making is that it is a

crimeeconomy-jobs
125
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

The Minister is somewhat chopping and changing her arguments. I can stand up and say that if budgets and resources were no issue, I would prefer every case to go to a jury trial. I can say that; I can be consistent that that is my preference, because I think they are, in some respects, a superior form of justice to mag

crimeeconomy-jobs
301
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I am just being consistent.

crimeeconomy-jobs
5
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I will take this opportunity to address some of the points raised in this morning’s debate, and to expand on areas that were points of contention. There was healthy debate about the record of the issues that were inherited by this Government. One reason why this Government have got so quickly into so much difficulty is

crimeeconomy-jobs
165
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I will move on to a more directly relevant point. When we talk about the challenges in the courts and what was inherited, the Government would do themselves a much greater service and reflect accurately the debate and the challenges if they more regularly sought to speak fairly and freely about what actually happened i

crimeeconomy-jobs
1,317
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

The Minister is factually incorrect. The engagement session was not today, but yesterday. I met Sir Brian, my hon. Friend the Member for West Suffolk (Nick Timothy) met Sir Brian, and Conservative shadow Ministers met Sir Brian during his review. It is completely incorrect for the Minister to suggest that we did not en

crimeeconomy-jobs
103
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

It absolutely does—but the Minister is not doing what Sir Brian recommended. She is rejecting his approach, but when we want to reject his approach, she asks how we can possibly question what Sir Brian has to say on such matters. That is the reality of what is happening. It is a consistent flaw that the Government cann

crimeeconomy-jobs
320
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I will finish the sentence, and then I will. Of course, we would assume that they had done that in consultation with other leadership figures, so we might reasonably say that they speak on behalf of the senior leadership team of the CPS, but there was an attempt to say that their views can somehow be taken to represent

crimeeconomy-jobs
70
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I will finish the sentence, and then I will. As my hon. Friend the hon. Member for Chatham and Aylesford pointed out, the CPS is a very big organisation, with a lot of people.

crimeeconomy-jobs
34
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Nothing that I have said is in disagreement with that. The point we are making is about whether that reflects the wider, individual views of all the people who work for the CPS. I am not aware that the CPS, for example, undertook an internal staff survey. Does the hon. Lady want to intervene and tell me whether the CPS

crimeeconomy-jobs
427
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

There is a fundamental difference between the CPS and, for example, the Criminal Bar Association, which is a representative organisation—its job is to represent its members. The CPS is not a representative organisation of its employees. The hon. Gentleman is comparing totally different things. I will absolutely listen

crimeeconomy-jobs
93
← PreviousPage 22 of 53 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.