The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,029 contributions

Speeches by Mullan.

Every Hansard contribution by Kieran Mullan this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 421440 of 1,029 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 22 of 52Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I do not think I am being the least bit unfair. I did not even ask the Minister to give a list or specifics; I just asked whether the statistics were going down in some parts of the country. That is a very broad and open question. I am flabbergasted that the Minister did not know whether things were improving, given th

crimeeconomy-jobs
579
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I thank the Minister for explaining the measures as she understands them. I do not mind admitting that some of the explanations in the explanatory notes and the information from the Library have left us with questions about how the measure will operate. The clause refers to written indication of guilty plea, and the ex

crimeeconomy-jobs
640
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I do. In the other direction, the Institute for Government highlights that “only around 30% of sentences of 6-12 months were handed out by magistrates” since their sentencing powers increased from six months to 12 months. That indicates a hesitation in the magistrates courts to award higher sentences. If the Government

crimeeconomy-jobs
257
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

The point was made very powerfully in the evidence sessions that we have this idea that we have to take a lot of time to explain all this complex stuff to a jury, and that we can just skip through it in a rapid way with a judge. I visited courts and spoke to judges when I was on the Justice Committee. They themselves a

crimeeconomy-jobs
245
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

What does not bear up to much scrutiny is for the Minister to say, “Actually, the package as a whole will deliver these major reforms,” because we do not object to the whole package. We can say, “Go ahead and do the things that we do not object to, and we will have violent agreement at later stages in the Bill.” The Go

crimeeconomy-jobs
134
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I covered all the statistics on the reforms that the hon. Member for Rugby mentioned this morning. The scale of these changes, compared with the scale of those changes, is absolutely unprecedented. There has never been a reduction in jury trials of the scale before us today. In support of the point being made by my hon

crimeeconomy-jobs
105
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

rose—

crimeeconomy-jobs
1
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

It would assist the Committee to know why we are making these comparisons. I have figures on the effect of the reclassification of criminal offences in the Criminal Justice Act 1988, which is one of the examples that the hon. Member for Rugby used in order to say that we are unfairly comparing the categorisations. Let

crimeeconomy-jobs
152
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

On a point of order, Ms Butler. This speaks to the heart of the confusion at the start of the debate. On the one hand, the Minister wants to say that it is arbitrary and inconsequential, but the explanatory notes say that this is fundamental to enacting clause 1. That is what the Minister said—that these two things sit

crimeeconomy-jobs
86
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Reflecting on what has been said, I think that confusion remains. I welcome the further remarks from the Minister, but I am still not clear on whether there will be any impact in the real world for people as a result of the change. Earlier, I read out a sentence from the explanatory notes that talks about how the claus

crimeeconomy-jobs
1,167
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

My final point in opposition to clauses 1 and 2 is that the hon. Member for Kingston upon Hull East (Karl Turner), who is not here today, would have had a lot to say during our proceedings. He is a Labour MP who has quite literally never rebelled against the Labour Whip. Ms Butler, you have probably been here longer th

crimeeconomy-jobs
143
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I am not clear that that is the case.

crimeeconomy-jobs
9
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Sorry—I am not clear that there will not be real-world consequences in the kind of ways that the hon. Member for Kingston upon Hull East will understand. The Minister nodded her head when I suggested that fewer people will get a Crown court trial as a result of clause 2. The Minister indicated from a sedentary position

crimeeconomy-jobs
123
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I rise to speak in support of amendment 39 tabled in my name. As I touched on earlier this morning, along with amendments 23 and 24—which are driving at the same point, but in slightly different ways—we are revisiting the discussion that we in the Opposition framed as a broad categorisation of principles of natural jus

crimeeconomy-jobs
1,224
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I thank the Minister for picking me up on that; I meant that they are determining the guilt of individuals who can then face up to three years in prison. It undermines the veracity and importance of Sir Brian’s recommendations that the Government do not have the support of his report on this, the profoundest and most u

crimeeconomy-jobs
1,136
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

The Minister put that question very succinctly, in exactly the same way, to members of the criminal Bar, who know much more about this than me; they were very clear that they did not accept her point. She is contrasting a magistrate or a police officer, who must be trained from scratch, to barristers, who practise in a

crimeeconomy-jobs
307
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

The point I am making is that we actually do not know that, because we do not know how many people used to practise who could now practise again. I absolutely agree with the Minister that there might need to be a further wave of people that will potentially exhaust the people who could be succinctly brought back into p

crimeeconomy-jobs
285
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I am afraid that we are again at violent agreement and disagreement at the same time. The principle that hon. Member is talking about is absolutely fair. There will be a period of time in which we have to retrain people; but as I said, the Committee has had barristers before it who were very clear that they thought the

crimeeconomy-jobs
433
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Yes, and I have made that point in other debates on this issue: we cannot say that with absolute certainly. The Deputy Prime Minister is clear—I think his phrase was that we have to explain why these things exist. The point is that we certainly cannot rule out that explanation, and it is certainly not an unreasonable c

crimeeconomy-jobs
395
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Yes, I accept that, to a degree, the Government have attempted to put in place safeguards. The question is: what weight can be given to those safeguards? We had a discussion earlier today about judicial accountability and whether we think the decisions made are good decisions. Family courts are a helpful comparator bec

crimeeconomy-jobs
237
← PreviousPage 22 of 52 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.