Electoral Reform.
Voting systems and democratic representation
Each row is one party. The bar shows how its MPs voted relative to a neutral midpoint — to the right = on-side with the majority position, to the left = opposed. The percentage figure is the share of that party’s MPs who took the same side: higher = more whip-disciplined, closer to 50% = a freer vote.
| Party | Stance vs neutral midpoint | Net % | Discipline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | Lab | +39 | 89% on-whip · 317 MPs | |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Con | -50 | 0% on-whip · 106 MPs | |
| Liberal Democrats | LD | +50 | 100% on-whip · 70 MPs | |
| Labour and Co-operative Party | Lab | +39 | 89% on-whip · 36 MPs | |
| Independent | Ind | +27 | 77% on-whip · 12 MPs | |
| Scottish National Party | SNP | +50 | 100% on-whip · 7 MPs | |
| Reform UK | Ref | -30 | 20% on-whip · 6 MPs | |
| Green Party of England and Wales | Grn | +50 | 100% on-whip · 5 MPs |
Source · Hansard · alignment is the share of party MPs who voted with the party majority on tagged divisions
| Date | Motion | Aye | No | Carried |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Mar 2026 | Representation of the People Bill: Reasoned Amendment Aye: Oppose the Bill, rejecting measures such as votes at 16, automatic voter registration, and expanded electoral regulation on grounds of principle or practicality · No: Support the Bill proceeding, backing votes at 16, automatic registration, tighter donation rules, and stronger protections for candidates and electoral staff | 107 | 409 | No |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Elections (proportional representation): Ten Minute Rule Motion Aye: Support introducing proportional representation, arguing that first-past-the-post produces wildly disproportionate results and leaves most voters unrepresented by their preferred candidate · No: Oppose replacing first-past-the-post, arguing it provides clarity, simplicity, and a clear one-to-one link between each constituency and its single MP | 140 | 134 | Yes |
All 2 divisions on this issue →
Mapping each Westminster issue to the equivalent council service bucket (so “Electoral Reform” → the matching service line on council finance, with the ranked-spend table this section wants) is its own taxonomy job. Council service spend lives on the council pages today; cross-cut by issue here in a follow-on pass.