A divisionDivision No. 52 · Tuesday, 3 December 2024· Commons· Electoral Reform

Elections (proportional representation): Ten Minute Rule Motion

138Ayes
136Noes
Carried · majority 2 · Government lost
376 did not vote
Aye140No134DID NOT VOTE · 376

650 Members · Aye 138 · No 136 · DNV 376 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 3 December 2024, MPs voted by 138 to 136 to allow a Liberal Democrat bill to be introduced in Parliament that would replace first-past-the-post with proportional representation for UK parliamentary elections and English local government elections. The bill, brought forward by Sarah Olney under the Ten Minute Rule procedure, passed by the narrowest of margins: a majority of just two votes. The bill proposes adopting the single transferable vote system, under which voters rank candidates in order of preference rather than selecting one. Its supporters argue this would ensure that MPs are elected with broad majority support in their constituencies, pointing to the July 2024 general election in which Labour won roughly two-thirds of seats with around one-third of votes cast. Opponents argue that first-past-the-post is simpler for voters and preserves a direct, one-to-one link between each constituency and a single MP accountable to all residents. The vote cut across party lines, but followed a broadly predictable pattern. All 65 voting Liberal Democrats backed the bill, as did all four Plaid Cymru MPs and all four Greens. Every voting Conservative opposed it, as did the Democratic Unionist Party. Labour was divided: 60 Labour and Labour-Co-operative MPs voted in favour, while 47 voted against, and the large majority of the parliamentary Labour party (296 MPs) had no vote recorded. The government took no official position, and the bill's passage reflects the fragility of any consensus on electoral reform rather than a settled majority in its favour.

Voting Aye meant
Support introducing proportional representation, arguing that first-past-the-post produces wildly disproportionate results and leaves most voters unrepresented by their preferred candidate
Voting No meant
Oppose replacing first-past-the-post, arguing it provides clarity, simplicity, and a clear one-to-one link between each constituency and its single MP
§ 01Who voted how.274 voting Members · 376 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
52
42
267
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
77
39
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
64
0
7
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
8
5
29
Independent
5
2
7
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
2
2
3
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
1
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.2 principal speakers
Sarah OlneySupportiveRichmond Park
First-past-the-post is fundamentally broken; Labour won 63% of seats on 34% of votes, leaving 60% of voters unrepresented; proportional representation via STV would restore democratic legitimacy, preserve local constituency links, and rebuild public trust in politics.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,679 words)
Lewis CockingOpposedBroxbourne
FPTP provides clarity, simplicity, and strong local accountability; voters know exactly who their single MP is and can hold them to account; proportional systems lead to undemocratic post-election coalition negotiations and chaos; the public rejected PR in 2011.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (851 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0