House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill: Reasoned Amendment to Second Reading
105Ayes
453Noes
Defeated · majority 348 · Government won88 did not vote
646 Members · Aye 105 · No 453 · DNV 88 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
MPs voted on 15 October 2024 on a Conservative reasoned amendment (a procedural motion arguing a bill should not proceed as currently drafted) to the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill at its second reading. The amendment sought to block the Bill from advancing on the grounds that it was incomplete without wider Lords reform measures. It was defeated by 453 votes to 105. The Bill itself would remove the remaining 92 hereditary peers, including the 90 elected by their fellow peers and the holders of the offices of Earl Marshal and Lord Great Chamberlain, who had been preserved as members of the Lords under section 2 of the House of Lords Act 1999. By defeating this reasoned amendment, the Commons allowed the Bill to proceed to its committee stage. The vote directly advanced Labour's stated manifesto commitment to end the right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in Parliament. The division split almost entirely along party lines. All 100 Conservative MPs who voted backed the amendment, joined by all 5 Reform UK MPs who voted and 2 independents. Every voting Labour, Labour and Co-operative, Liberal Democrat, Plaid Cymru, Green, and SDLP MP voted against, producing the 453-strong majority. There were no Conservative MPs voting No and no Labour MPs voting Aye.
Voting Aye meant
Support blocking the Bill at Second Reading, arguing it is incomplete without wider Lords reform measures such as a retirement age, participation requirements, and a more representative second chamber
Voting No meant
Support the Bill proceeding, backing Labour's manifesto commitment to remove hereditary peers as the immediate first step in Lords reform, with further changes to follow
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
326
35
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
100
0
16
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
68
3
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
39
3
Independent
—
2
7
5
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
0
0
5
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
2
0
Your Party
—
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Moves New Clause 48 on tax consequences of transfer schemes, establishing Treasury regulatory powers for rail restructuring.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (13,161 words) →
Presents government new clauses and amendments, including Passengers' Charter, accessibility strategy, and rail devolution provisions.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (40,683 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0