A divisionDivision No. 19 · Tuesday, 15 October 2024· Commons· Constitution and Democracy

House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill: Reasoned Amendment to Second Reading

105Ayes
453Noes
Defeated · majority 348 · Government won
88 did not vote
Aye107No454DID NOT VOTE · 88

646 Members · Aye 105 · No 453 · DNV 88 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 15 October 2024, the House of Commons voted on a Conservative reasoned amendment (a procedural motion to reject a Bill at its second reading stage without allowing it to proceed further) to the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill. The amendment sought to block the Bill, which would end the automatic right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords. The amendment was defeated by 453 votes to 105, allowing the Bill to proceed. The Bill, if passed, would remove the remaining 92 hereditary peers from the Lords, completing a process begun by the Blair government in 1999. That earlier reform expelled most hereditary peers but left 92 as a temporary compromise. This legislation targets that remaining group. The change would affect the composition of one of Parliament's two chambers and alter how laws are scrutinised and amended, removing members who sit by virtue of inherited title rather than appointment or election. The vote divided sharply along party lines. All 100 voting Conservatives backed the amendment to block the Bill, joined by all 5 Reform UK MPs and 2 independents. Every voting Labour, Labour and Co-operative, Liberal Democrat, Plaid Cymru, Green, SDLP and TUV member opposed the amendment, supporting the Bill's progression. There were no Conservative votes against their own amendment and no government-side rebellions. The Bill continued through Parliament, with related divisions in November 2024 showing similarly large government majorities defeating Conservative attempts to amend it at committee stage.

Voting Aye meant
Support blocking the Bill, opposing the removal of hereditary peers from the House of Lords and resisting this stage of Lords reform
Voting No meant
Support the Bill proceeding, backing the government's plan to end the hereditary principle in the Lords as a first step in Lords reform
§ 01Who voted how.558 voting Members · 88 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
326
35
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
100
0
16
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
68
4
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
39
3
Independent
2
8
4
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
0
0
5
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
4
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0
Your Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.1 principal speaker
Sir Oliver DowdenOpposedHertsmere
Opposed to the bill, arguing it enacts major constitutional change without consensus, proper scrutiny, or consideration of its place within broader House of Lords reform.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0