A divisionDivision No. 4 · Tuesday, 23 July 2024· Commons· Constitution and Democracy

King's Speech (Motion for an Address): Amendment (k)

85Ayes
382Noes
Defeated · majority 297 · Government won
180 did not vote
Aye87No382DID NOT VOTE · 180

647 Members · Aye 85 · No 382 · DNV 180 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 23 July 2024, the House of Commons voted on Amendment (k) to the King's Speech, a motion put forward as part of the traditional opposition debate on the government's legislative programme. The amendment was defeated by 382 votes to 85. The King's Speech debate is the formal parliamentary occasion on which MPs debate and can challenge the government's plans for the parliamentary session, and opposition amendments are the standard mechanism for doing so. The vote concerned issues of constitution and democracy, with the amendment representing a Conservative-aligned critique of the incoming Labour government's plans in this area. The defeat of the amendment means that Labour's legislative programme on constitutional and democratic matters faces no immediate parliamentary obstacle. With such a large majority voting against the amendment, the government retains a strong mandate to proceed with its agenda as set out in the King's Speech. Notably, the Conservative Party does not appear in the voting record at all, suggesting low or absent turnout from the Official Opposition. The 85 votes in favour came overwhelmingly from the Liberal Democrats, who provided 66 of the Ayes, alongside smaller contributions from independents, Plaid Cymru, the Green Party, Reform UK, and the Social Democratic and Labour Party. Labour and its Co-operative Party allies voted unanimously against. The Democratic Unionist Party and Traditional Unionist Voice sided with the government in opposition. This unusual cross-party shape, with non-Conservative parties providing most of the Aye votes, reflects the particular dynamics of the 2024 parliament following Labour's landslide general election victory.

Voting Aye meant
Support Amendment (k) to the King's Speech, backing the specific alternative priorities or criticisms it proposed against the government's agenda
Voting No meant
Reject Amendment (k), backing the government's stated legislative programme as set out in the King's Speech
§ 01Who voted how.467 voting Members · 180 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
332
29
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
66
0
6
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
39
3
Independent
6
4
4
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
3
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1
0
0
Restore Britain
1
0
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0
Your Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Sir James CleverlyOpposedBraintree
Criticized Labour's cancellation of Rwanda asylum scheme, effective amnesty for illegal arrivals, and poor diplomatic handling; defended Conservative policing and migration records while accusing Labour of abandoning tough rhetoric.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (4,153 words)
Yvette CooperSupportivePontefract, Castleford and Knottingley
Outlined three-pillar Home Office strategy (crime/policing, borders/asylum, security); criticized Conservative legacy on police numbers, visa system mismanagement, and Rwanda scheme's wasteful £700m spend with minimal results.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,485 words)
Christine JardineSupportiveEdinburgh West
Welcomed Home Secretary's openness to cross-party working; supported scrapping Rwanda scheme and called for proper community policing, court backlog reduction, and better immigration system for economy and genuine refugees.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,767 words)
Sir Desmond SwayneOpposedNew Forest West
Acknowledged election defeat; defended Rwanda scheme as part of deterrent strategy and criticized its abandonment; emphasized need for international development spending and returns agreements as long-term solutions.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,006 words)
Debbie AbrahamsSupportiveOldham East and Saddleworth
Focused on poverty, inequality, and disabled people's rights; welcomed King's Speech measures on child poverty, social security, and living standards as remedy to 14 years of Conservative cuts.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,228 words)
Helen HayesSupportiveDulwich and West Norwood
Emphasized impact of Conservative cuts on schools, housing, health, and children's mental health; welcomed Labour's legislative programme for child poverty, education, and young people's wellbeing.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,213 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0