Inquiry · 28 November 2025 → 31 July 2026
Financial Inclusion Strategy
From: Treasury Committee
What this inquiry is asking
Does the Government's Financial Inclusion Strategy adequately address the 20 million UK residents excluded from financial services? The inquiry examined whether the strategy is person-centred rather than product-focused, whether it contains measurable outcomes and enforcement mechanisms, and whether the balance between government intervention and voluntary industry compliance is sufficient to tackle systemic exclusion affecting ethnic minorities, elderly people, women experiencing economic abuse, and low-income households.
Headline findings
- The strategy is product-focused rather than person-centred, failing to disaggregate impact by gender, ethnicity, disability, employment status, age, and affordability—critical gaps for targeted intervention.
- Strategy development was structurally imbalanced: 16 industry representatives versus 4 consumer representatives on sub-committees, giving industry disproportionate influence over a strategy meant to constrain exclusionary practices.
- No clear accountability mechanisms, measurable outcomes, or enforcement powers exist; industry witnesses conceded outcome measurement mechanisms are currently absent and reliance on pilot work before target-setting suggests insufficient ambition.
- Critical areas omitted entirely: pensions (especially for the self-employed), digital inclusion, motor insurance, and savings resilience—cross-cutting issues affecting millions.
- Pilot evidence shows government-backed intervention works: HSBC-Shelter onboarded 8,000 homeless customers through improved ID verification, and the no-interest loan scheme demonstrates government guarantees enable industry to serve excluded populations.
Why it matters
Financial exclusion locks millions out of banking, credit, insurance, and pensions; a weakly enforced strategy risks embedding rather than solving systemic barriers that disproportionately harm ethnic minorities, elderly people, and women in economic abuse.
Tone arc
Started cooperative with independent experts identifying systemic structural failures (lack of data disaggregation, power imbalance in strategy development), shifted to mixed concern when industry witnesses acknowledged gaps but claimed comfort with the strategy's deliverability, raising MP anxiety that insufficient systemic change is being demanded.
Themes
Key witnesses
Sian Williams (Financial Inclusion Commission chair), Dr Eleni Karagiannaki (LSE), Mick McAteer (Financial Inclusion and Markets Centre), Jasjyot Singh OBE (Lloyds Banking Group), Alison Rayner (Nationwide Building Society), Professor Abdelhafid Benamraoui (University of Westminster), Helen Undy (consumer advocate), Michelle Highman (financial services expert)
Outcome
Government response not yet published.
Witness sessions
Oral evidence · 3 February 2026 · HC 1552
Session 1 of 3Oral evidence · 4 March 2026 · HC 1552
Session 2 of 3Oral evidence · 25 March 2026 · HC 1552
Session 3 of 3
Written evidence & correspondence
Correspondence · 13 May 2026
Correspondence · 13 May 2026
Correspondence · 13 May 2026
Correspondence · 13 May 2026
Correspondence · 13 May 2026
Correspondence · 13 May 2026
Correspondence · 15 April 2026
Correspondence · 10 March 2026
Themes & actors
Topics across publication summaries
Top organisations & named entities
- Dame Meg Hillier MP·5 references
- Treasury Committee·3 references
- Dame Meg Hillier·3 references
- Hannah Gurga·2 references
- Association of British Insurers (ABI)·2 references
- Stephen Noakes·2 references
- Jasjyot Singh·2 references
- Lloyds Banking Group·2 references
- Sam Smethers·2 references
- Surviving Economic Abuse·2 references
Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗