A divisionDivision No. 10 · Tuesday, 2 June 2026· Commons· Armed Forces Support

Armed Forces Bill Committee: New Clause 13

80Ayes
298Noes
Defeated · majority 218 · Government won
267 did not vote
Aye81No299DID NOT VOTE · 267

645 Members · Aye 80 · No 298 · DNV 267 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 2 June 2026 on New Clause 13 to the Armed Forces Bill, which would have required an independent review into the standard of single living accommodation for service personnel. The clause was defeated by 298 votes to 80. The practical effect of the clause would have been to mandate external scrutiny of housing conditions for serving personnel who live in single living accommodation rather than service family homes. Proponents argued that single living accommodation is, for many personnel, not a temporary arrangement but a permanent home throughout their career, and that its condition directly affects both welfare and retention. The government opposed the clause, with Labour MPs pointing to the new defence housing service being established through the Bill as the appropriate vehicle for improving standards. Labour MPs voted unanimously against the clause, providing the bulk of the 298 noes. The Liberal Democrats were the principal force behind it, contributing 58 of the 80 aye votes. The Democratic Unionist Party, the Green Party, Plaid Cymru, Reform UK, and several smaller parties and independents also voted in favour. The clause sits alongside a series of related defeats for opposition amendments on the same day, including New Clauses 2, 5 and 6, all of which were also defeated by comparable margins. The Liberal Democrats and their allies were unable to overcome the government's substantial Commons majority.

Voting Aye meant
Support requiring an independent review of single living accommodation, arguing that unmarried or unpartnered service personnel often live in such housing for their entire careers and it has been neglected compared to family accommodation
Voting No meant
Oppose the new clause, arguing the government's new Defence Housing Service and its plan to modernise over 40,000 military homes already addresses accommodation standards comprehensively, and a separate review would undermine the new service before it has started
§ 01Who voted how.378 voting Members · 267 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.

Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted No
0
268
92
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Voted Aye
57
0
14
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted No
0
29
13
Independent
4
2
7
Reform UK
Voted Aye
3
0
5
Scottish National Party
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Voted Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Voted Aye
5
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Voted Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Al CarnsSupportiveBirmingham Selly Oak
Minister defending government amendments to expand covenant duty to regional authorities, modernise defence housing with 40,000 upgrades, and strengthen service justice protections including mandatory referral of sexual offences to civilian police.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (16,318 words)
Mark FrancoisQuestioningRayleigh and Wickford
Intervened on lack of Reform MP attendance at material defence legislation, criticising 'plastic patriots' unwilling to show up for armed forces matters.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (12,648 words)
Jim AllisterOpposedNorth Antrim
Questioned why Northern Ireland district councils were excluded from covenant duty scope when all other local authorities across UK were included, pressing Minister on inconsistency.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (194 words)
Chris VinceSupportiveHarlow
Supported government housing investment for veterans and emphasised importance of mental health support alongside housing provision, citing personal experience with homeless veterans.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (278 words)
Helena DollimoreSupportiveHastings and Rye
Praised East Sussex Veterans' Hub grant and innovative mental health support programmes, inviting Minister to visit constituency initiatives.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (344 words)
Dr Andrew MurrisonQuestioningSouth West Wiltshire
Cautioned against portraying all veterans as homeless or mentally unwell, emphasising majority of personnel transition well to civilian life and that negative narratives deter recruitment.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (3,110 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0