Armed Forces Bill Committee: New Clause 2
171Ayes
302Noes
Defeated · majority 131 · Government won170 did not vote
643 Members · Aye 171 · No 302 · DNV 170 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 2 June 2026 on New Clause 2 to the Armed Forces Bill, a Conservative amendment that would have required special educational needs plans for children of service personnel to transfer automatically when a military family is posted to a new area. The clause covered Education, Health and Care Plans in England, Individual Development Plans in Wales, Co-ordinated Support Plans in Scotland, and Statements of Special Educational Needs in Northern Ireland. The amendment was defeated by 302 votes to 171. The vote matters because the portability of SEN plans is a live problem for armed forces families. When a service parent is posted to a new base, the child's existing plan does not follow them automatically; the receiving local authority must reassess, which can mean delays and gaps in support for children who are already managing the disruption of a move. The amendment would have required the Secretary of State to make regulations within six months of the Act's passage to make transfer automatic, and would have guaranteed families reasonable time to negotiate a named school. By voting the clause down, Parliament left the existing system in place, with the government committing instead to cross-departmental work and voluntary mechanisms. Labour and the Labour and Co-operative group voted solidly against, providing all 302 no votes, with 101 Labour-affiliated MPs absent. The Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, the Democratic Unionist Party, the Green Party, and Plaid Cymru all voted for the clause. Two Reform UK MPs voted aye, though six had no vote recorded, a point noted acidly in the debate by Armed Forces Minister Al Carns. The vote fell on the same day as several related divisions on the Armed Forces Bill, including a similar defeat on New Clause 5, which lost by 301 to 170.
Voting Aye meant
Support requiring automatic transfer of SEN plans for children of armed forces personnel when families are posted to a new base, giving military families a statutory right to continuity of support.
Voting No meant
Oppose legislating a rigid statutory requirement for SEN plan transfers, preferring practical improvements through cross-government working rather than a fixed legal duty — the government's stated position.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The party-line column is inferred from how cohesively each party voted, not a published whip: a clear one-way majority of a party’s voters reads as a line, a close division reads as “Split”.
Party
Party line
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Voted No
0
272
88
Conservative and Unionist Party
Voted Aye
93
0
23
Liberal Democrats
Voted Aye
57
0
14
Labour and Co-operative Party
Voted No
0
29
13
Independent
—
5
2
6
Reform UK
—
2
0
6
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Voted Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Voted Aye
5
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Voted Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
1
0
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · party line inferred from voting cohesion, not a published whip; “Split” = a close within-party division
Minister defending government amendments to expand covenant duty to regional authorities, modernise defence housing with 40,000 upgrades, and strengthen service justice protections including mandatory referral of sexual offences to civilian police.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (16,318 words) →
Intervened on lack of Reform MP attendance at material defence legislation, criticising 'plastic patriots' unwilling to show up for armed forces matters.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (12,648 words) →
Questioned why Northern Ireland district councils were excluded from covenant duty scope when all other local authorities across UK were included, pressing Minister on inconsistency.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (194 words) →
Supported government housing investment for veterans and emphasised importance of mental health support alongside housing provision, citing personal experience with homeless veterans.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (278 words) →
Praised East Sussex Veterans' Hub grant and innovative mental health support programmes, inviting Minister to visit constituency initiatives.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (344 words) →
Cautioned against portraying all veterans as homeless or mentally unwell, emphasising majority of personnel transition well to civilian life and that negative narratives deter recruitment.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,110 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0