Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 102

Monday, 9 March 2026 · Division No. 442 · Commons

315Ayes
163Noes
Passed

170 MPs did not vote

leftGovernment wonPro State Control Of School Admissions(Yes)Pro Parental School Choice(No)Pro Academy Autonomy(No)Pro Local Authority Oversight(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support the government's power to reduce pupil admission numbers at oversubscribed good and outstanding schools, rejecting the Lords' protection of parental choice

Voting No means

Oppose restricting good and outstanding schools from admitting more pupils, arguing parental choice drives school improvement and popular schools should be allowed to grow

What happened: On 9 March 2026, the House of Commons voted to disagree with Lords Amendment 102 to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, by 315 votes to 163. This means the Commons rejected a change the House of Lords had inserted into the Bill and restored the government's original wording. The vote is part of the "ping-pong" process (the back-and-forth between the two Houses when they disagree on the text of a Bill).

Why it matters: Lords Amendment 102 related to children's wellbeing provisions within the Bill. By voting it down, the Commons maintained the government's preferred approach to how schools and related services handle children's welfare. The practical effect depends on the specific wording of the amendment, but in general terms the Commons has blocked an alternative framework the Lords sought to introduce -- meaning the policy as the government designed it remains intact. The Bill as a whole covers a wide range of issues including school regulation, home education oversight, and child protection duties.

The politics: The vote fell almost entirely along government versus opposition lines. Labour MPs and their Co-operative Party allies voted solidly with the government (307 Ayes in total), while Conservatives (97) and Liberal Democrats (61) voted against -- together forming the bulk of the 163 Noes. The Democratic Unionist Party also voted No. There were no notable Labour rebels. The result mirrors several other Commons rejections of Lords amendments to this Bill on the same day, including divisions on Amendments 106, 16, and 17, all of which the government also won comfortably.

How They Voted

Government position: Aye

Labour PartyWhipped Aye
280 Aye/0 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/97 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0 Aye/61 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
27 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
4 Aye/0 No
Independent
2 Aye/1 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/3 No
Reform UK
0 Aye/1 No
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1 Aye/0 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
1 Aye/0 No

Related News

Special school expansion for SEND pupils could be cut, secret memo shows

inews.co.uk20 Mar

Secret plans to curb the expansion of special school expansion could lead to a shortage of places for children with complex special educational needs and disabilities (SEND), insiders have warned. A suite of documents sent to local authorities shows cash-strapped councils could be financially penalised if they plan to build or expand special schools for children with SEND, rather than provide specialist support in mainstream schools. The Department for Education (DfE) will issue a grant to wip

13 March 2026: free breakfast clubs: summary business case

gov.uk13 MarHigh relevance

In April 2025, the Department for Education () launched the early adopter () test-and-learn scheme for the free breakfast clubs (FBC) programme. The government has committed to create a new mandatory free breakfast club duty for all state-funded schools with primary aged pupils on roll. The scheme tests how schools can effectively deliver the minimum requirements, with findings being used to inform national rollout. The scheme launched with 750 schools and, at the point of writing, this busines

Education Secretary's speech at the RISE inclusion conference | Department for Education

WiredGov10 Mar

Education Secretary's key note speech given yesterday at the South East RISE inclusion conference. Today I want to start by telling you about a child with an inspiring story. His name is Joshua - and he's a happy boy from Brighton. At age five Joshua was diagnosed with Autism. In his own words, it's a part of him, but not what defines him. Now his first experience of school wasn't great. The school wasn't set up to meet his needs - and so he could only manage 10 minutes in the classroom a

Related Votes