A divisionDivision No. 451 · Wednesday, 18 March 2026· Commons· Higher Education

Draft Higher Education (Fee Limits and Fee Limit Condition) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2026

277Ayes
99Noes
Carried · majority 178 · Government won
274 did not vote
Aye277No99DID NOT VOTE · 274

650 Members · Aye 277 · No 99 · DNV 274 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 18 March 2026 to approve the Draft Higher Education (Fee Limits and Fee Limit Condition) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2026, passing the measure by 277 votes to 99. The regulations raise the annual tuition fee cap for undergraduate students at fee-capped providers in England from £9,250 to approximately £9,535 for the 2026-27 and 2027-28 academic years, an increase of around 2.7% and 2.68% respectively in those two years. The vote means universities in England can charge higher fees for the first time since the cap was last adjusted, which supporters argue is necessary to prevent further institutional financial instability in the sector. The increase will add to the debt carried by students taking out loans to cover their fees, and the change sits alongside a separate freeze on the repayment threshold, which determines at what earnings level graduates begin repaying their loans. Together, these measures affect the total cost faced by graduates over the life of their repayment. Labour MPs voted overwhelmingly in favour, with 248 Labour and 28 Labour and Co-operative members supporting the regulations and only 19 voting against across both groups. The Liberal Democrats voted solidly against, all 55 of their voting members opposing the measure, as did Reform UK's six voting members, the Democratic Unionist Party's five, the three Green MPs, and a majority of voting independents. The Conservatives were largely absent: only two voted, both against, while 114 had no vote recorded. The vote took place on the same day as a separate opposition day motion on student loans, which the government defeated by 266 to 88.

Voting Aye meant
Support raising the tuition fee cap to stabilise university finances and sustain the higher education sector, accepting the cost to students as a necessary trade-off.
Voting No meant
Oppose the fee increase as an unfair burden on young people, arguing it should not proceed without wider reform of the student finance system or clearer commitments on repayment terms and university accountability.
§ 01Who voted how.376 voting Members · 274 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
248
18
95
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
2
114
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
54
17
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
28
1
13
Independent
1
5
7
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
6
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
5
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
2
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Your Party
0
2
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
1
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.5 principal speakers
Josh MacAlisterSupportiveWhitehaven and Workington
The fee increases are necessary to ensure financial stability for higher education providers facing severe deficits and income losses, and must be set in line with inflation to protect the sector's future.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,276 words)
Alicia KearnsOpposedRutland and Stamford
The fee increases contradict Labour's election pledges, add unaffordable debt to young people already struggling in the labour market, and represent a betrayal without delivering better university outcomes.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,074 words)
Ian SollomOpposedSt Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire
While universities face genuine financial pressures, fee increases must be coupled with wider reforms including a royal commission on graduate finance, university accountability for outcomes, and transparent use of funds.Liberal Democrats · Voted no · Read full speech (402 words)
Dan CardenQuestioningLiverpool Walton
Fee increases alone are insufficient to secure universities' financial footing; deeper structural reform is needed to address reliance on international student cross-subsidy and prepare for modern challenges like AI.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (162 words)
David Burton-SampsonSupportiveSouthend West and Leigh
The Conservative criticism is hypocritical given their 2012 coalition government tripled tuition fees to £9,000.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (38 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0