Draft Higher Education (Fee Limits and Fee Limit Condition) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2026
Wednesday, 18 March 2026 · Division No. 451 · Commons
274 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support raising university tuition fees by 2.71% for 2026-27, arguing it is necessary to sustain higher education funding
Voting No means
Oppose the tuition fee increase, arguing it adds to the financial burden on young people in a difficult labour market
What happened
On 18 March 2026, the House of Commons approved the Draft Higher Education (Fee Limits and Fee Limit Condition) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2026, a statutory instrument (a form of secondary legislation that does not require a full new Act of Parliament) raising the cap on university tuition fees in England. The result was announced as a deferred division -- a procedure used for less contentious business where MPs vote by filing through the lobbies at a set time rather than during live debate. The regulations passed by 277 votes to 99 (recorded as 98 Noes in the chamber announcement), with the government voting in favour.
Why it matters
The regulations increase the legal ceiling on the annual fees that English universities can charge home undergraduate students. Since fees were first introduced and then raised to £9,000 per year in 2012, the cap has been a central mechanism shaping how higher education is funded in England. Raising it means students starting or continuing degrees will graduate with larger total debts, since most finance their fees through government-backed student loans. It also affects the finances of universities directly -- institutions have argued that the existing cap, unadjusted for inflation over many years, has put significant pressure on budgets. The change applies to English universities and affects home students in England; it does not directly govern fees for international students, who already pay unregulated, much higher amounts.
The politics
The vote divided largely along government-versus-opposition lines, but with notable internal Labour dissent. Of the 276 Labour and Labour-Co-operative MPs who voted, 19 voted against the regulations -- a visible rebellion on a policy that sits uneasily with Labour's historic commitments on student finance and its opposition to the original introduction of higher fees under the Coalition government. Every Liberal Democrat who voted did so against, as did all voting Reform UK, DUP, Green and most Independent MPs. The Conservatives were largely absent rather than voting against, which significantly reduced the size of the opposition tally. The same day saw a related opposition-day motion on student loans defeated 266 to 88, underlining that Parliament was handling tuition fee politics on multiple fronts simultaneously.
How They Voted
Government position: Aye
18 rebels: Andy McDonald, Apsana Begum, Bell Ribeiro-Addy, Brian Leishman, Cat Eccles, Clive Lewis, Ian Byrne, Ian Lavery + 10 more
19 MPs voted against their party whip
Related Votes
Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill: motion relating to Lords Amendment 38
15 Apr 2026
Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 41B
15 Apr 2026
Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill: motion relating to Lords Amendment 102
15 Apr 2026
Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill: motion relating to Lords Amendment 106
15 Apr 2026
Opposition day motion: student loans
18 Mar 2026
Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 16
9 Mar 2026
Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 17
9 Mar 2026
Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 37
9 Mar 2026
Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 38
9 Mar 2026
Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 41
9 Mar 2026