Employment Rights Bill: Government amendment (a) in lieu of LA62
Wednesday, 5 November 2025 · Division No. 343 · Commons
183 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support the Labour government's employment rights provisions, including stronger unfair dismissal protections, rejecting Lords amendments that weakened the Bill
Voting No means
Oppose the government's approach, arguing stronger dismissal protections will deter employers from hiring young and new workers and harm job creation
What happened: The House of Commons voted on 5 November 2025 to pass a government replacement amendment to Lords Amendment 62 of the Employment Rights Bill, by 311 votes to 152. Lords Amendment 62 would have removed a clause retaining the existing 50% turnout threshold for industrial action ballots. The government's substitute amendment, rather than simply accepting or rejecting the Lords position outright, requires the Secretary of State to consider the effects of introducing electronic balloting on voter turnout in industrial action ballots. The government's compromise position prevailed comfortably.
Why it matters: The vote concerns the rules governing when trade unions can legally call strikes. Under the current law, at least 50% of eligible union members must participate in a ballot for industrial action to be lawful. The Lords had sought to remove this threshold entirely. The government declined to go that far, instead proposing that any future introduction of electronic balloting, which could raise participation rates, must be assessed for its effect on turnout proportions. This preserves the threshold for now while signalling that it could be reviewed alongside modernisation of balloting methods. The outcome affects millions of unionised workers and their employers across the public and private sectors, bearing directly on the conditions under which strikes can occur.
The politics: Labour MPs voted unanimously in favour of the government's position, joined by SNP, Plaid Cymru, Green, and most independent members. Conservatives and Liberal Democrats voted together against, with Reform UK's two present members also opposing. The Liberal Democrats argued for retaining the full 50% threshold without qualification, while Conservatives characterised the broader bill as damaging to employment and economic growth. The vote is part of a prolonged parliamentary back-and-forth on the Employment Rights Bill between the Commons and Lords, with several related divisions occurring in December 2025 suggesting the bill remained contested well into its passage.
How They Voted
Government position: Aye
What They Said in the Debate
Conservative · Arundel and South Downs
Opposed the Bill as rushed and half-baked, warning it will reduce youth hiring, create unemployment, and burden small businesses with compliance costs; called for meaningful compromises on qualifying periods, seasonal work, and guaranteed hours obligations.
Voted No
Liberal Democrat · Richmond Park
Supported the Bill's aims but urged amendments to clarify probation periods, change guaranteed hours to a right-to-request model, and maintain the 50% ballot threshold; argued for balance between worker security and business flexibility.
Voted No
Labour · Halifax
Defended rejecting Lords amendments on day-one unfair dismissal rights, guaranteed hours, and strike ballot thresholds; argued these are core manifesto commitments that will provide security and dignity for workers while supporting fair employers.
Voted Aye
Labour · Ashton-under-Lyne
Passionately defended the Bill as delivering a new deal for working people, rejecting compromise amendments as attempts to water down manifesto promises; emphasized worker dignity and cited support from businesses like the Co-op and Richer Sounds.
Voted Aye
Labour · Ellesmere Port and Bromborough
Strongly opposed Lords amendments, particularly on zero-hours contracts and ballot thresholds; argued day-one unfair dismissal rights are essential and did not prevent probation periods; cited OECD evidence that employment regulation does not reduce employment.
Voted Aye
Labour · Blyth and Ashington
Defended the Bill as a manifesto pledge voted for by millions; cited research showing 73% of employers support day-one unfair dismissal rights; challenged Opposition claims about union influence by noting trade union support is transparent and democratic.
Voted Aye
Labour · Middlesbrough and Thornaby East
Strongly opposed all Lords amendments, arguing they would water down manifesto commitments on day-one rights, guaranteed hours, and ballot thresholds; framed the Bill as essential to raising living standards after 14 years of wage suppression.
Voted Aye
Labour · Tipton and Wednesbury
Declared no concessions on the Bill; opposed political fund opt-in and ballot thresholds as undemocratic attacks on worker voice; committed to full repeal of the Trade Union Act 2016.
Voted Aye
Related Votes
Opposition Day: Youth unemployment
28 Jan 2026
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to disagree with the Lords in their Amendment 120N to Commons Amendment 120G and their Amendments 120P to 120S to Commons Amendment 120H
15 Dec 2025
Opposition day: Seasonal work
10 Dec 2025
Government Amendment to Opposition day debate on seasonal work
10 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to Lords Amendment 1B but to propose Government amendments (a) and (b) in lieu of Lords Amendment 1B
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to LA23 and LA106 to LA120, not to insist on Commons Amendment 120C, 120D and 120E but to propose Gov (a) to (f) in lieu of LA23 and LA106 to LA120
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to Lords Amendment 48B but to propose Government amendment (a) and (b) in lieu of LA48B
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion not to insist on Commons Amendment 72C but to disagree with LA72D to LA72H and to propose Gov (a) and (b) in lieu of LA72D to LA72H
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to LA62 but not to insist on Commons Amendment 62C and to propose Gov (a) in lieu of LA62
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1B
5 Nov 2025