Employment Rights Bill: motion relating to Lords Reason 72B
Wednesday, 5 November 2025 · Division No. 342 · Commons
185 MPs did not vote
Voting Yes means
Support the Labour government's version of employment rights reforms, overriding Lords changes and maintaining stronger protections for workers including young people against unfair dismissal
Voting No means
Oppose overriding the Lords amendments, arguing the government's approach risks discouraging employers from hiring young people and imposing excessive burdens on business
Parliament voted on 5 November 2025 to reject a series of Lords amendments to the Employment Rights Bill, backing the government's original position on worker protections by 312 votes to 151. The motion in question concerned Lords Reason 72B, part of a broader package of disagreements with the upper chamber covering guaranteed hours for workers, unfair dismissal protections, trade union ballot thresholds, political funds, and provisions relating to heritage rail volunteering. The Commons passed the motion to insist on its own position and, in several cases, substitute government amendments in lieu of the Lords' alternatives.
The vote matters because the Employment Rights Bill is the government's central piece of legislation aimed at reshaping employment law in Great Britain. The areas covered by this package of motions include the right to guaranteed hours for workers on irregular contracts (sometimes called zero-hours contracts), day-one unfair dismissal protections, changes to trade union strike ballot thresholds, and the reversal of parts of the Conservative-era Trade Union Act 2016. Rejecting the Lords amendments means the government's versions of these provisions advance towards becoming law, extending protections to workers who currently have limited recourse if dismissed early in employment or offered unpredictable hours.
The vote divided almost entirely along party lines, with Labour and Labour Co-operative MPs voting unanimously in favour, joined by the Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and most independents. Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, and Reform UK voted against. There were no notable rebels on either side. The vote sits within a longer parliamentary ping-pong process between the Commons and the Lords, with related divisions in December 2025 showing the government consistently holding its position with majorities in the low-to-mid 300s.
How They Voted
Government position: Aye
What They Said in the Debate
Conservative · Arundel and South Downs
Opposed the Bill as rushed and half-baked, warning it will reduce youth hiring, create unemployment, and burden small businesses with compliance costs; called for meaningful compromises on qualifying periods, seasonal work, and guaranteed hours obligations.
Voted No
Liberal Democrat · Richmond Park
Supported the Bill's aims but urged amendments to clarify probation periods, change guaranteed hours to a right-to-request model, and maintain the 50% ballot threshold; argued for balance between worker security and business flexibility.
Voted No
Labour · Halifax
Defended rejecting Lords amendments on day-one unfair dismissal rights, guaranteed hours, and strike ballot thresholds; argued these are core manifesto commitments that will provide security and dignity for workers while supporting fair employers.
Voted Aye
Labour · Ashton-under-Lyne
Passionately defended the Bill as delivering a new deal for working people, rejecting compromise amendments as attempts to water down manifesto promises; emphasized worker dignity and cited support from businesses like the Co-op and Richer Sounds.
Voted Aye
Labour · Ellesmere Port and Bromborough
Strongly opposed Lords amendments, particularly on zero-hours contracts and ballot thresholds; argued day-one unfair dismissal rights are essential and did not prevent probation periods; cited OECD evidence that employment regulation does not reduce employment.
Voted Aye
Labour · Blyth and Ashington
Defended the Bill as a manifesto pledge voted for by millions; cited research showing 73% of employers support day-one unfair dismissal rights; challenged Opposition claims about union influence by noting trade union support is transparent and democratic.
Voted Aye
Labour · Middlesbrough and Thornaby East
Strongly opposed all Lords amendments, arguing they would water down manifesto commitments on day-one rights, guaranteed hours, and ballot thresholds; framed the Bill as essential to raising living standards after 14 years of wage suppression.
Voted Aye
Labour · Tipton and Wednesbury
Declared no concessions on the Bill; opposed political fund opt-in and ballot thresholds as undemocratic attacks on worker voice; committed to full repeal of the Trade Union Act 2016.
Voted Aye
Related Votes
Opposition Day: Youth unemployment
28 Jan 2026
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to disagree with the Lords in their Amendment 120N to Commons Amendment 120G and their Amendments 120P to 120S to Commons Amendment 120H
15 Dec 2025
Opposition day: Seasonal work
10 Dec 2025
Government Amendment to Opposition day debate on seasonal work
10 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to Lords Amendment 1B but to propose Government amendments (a) and (b) in lieu of Lords Amendment 1B
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to LA23 and LA106 to LA120, not to insist on Commons Amendment 120C, 120D and 120E but to propose Gov (a) to (f) in lieu of LA23 and LA106 to LA120
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to Lords Amendment 48B but to propose Government amendment (a) and (b) in lieu of LA48B
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion not to insist on Commons Amendment 72C but to disagree with LA72D to LA72H and to propose Gov (a) and (b) in lieu of LA72D to LA72H
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: Government motion to insist on disagreement to LA62 but not to insist on Commons Amendment 62C and to propose Gov (a) in lieu of LA62
8 Dec 2025
Employment Rights Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1B
5 Nov 2025