A divisionDivision No. 292 · Wednesday, 10 September 2025· Commons· Buses

Bus Services (No.2) Bill: Third Reading

362Ayes
87Noes
Carried · majority 275 · Government won
203 did not vote
Aye356No90DID NOT VOTE · 203

652 Members · Aye 362 · No 87 · DNV 203 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

The House of Commons gave final approval to the Bus Services (No.2) Bill on 10 September 2025, passing its Third Reading by 362 votes to 87. Third Reading is the last opportunity MPs have to vote on a bill in the Commons before it passes to the House of Lords, and a successful vote means the legislation proceeds to the upper chamber in its finalised form. The Bill advances reforms to how bus services in England are organised, expanding the powers of local authorities to take greater control over their bus networks, including provisions that enable public ownership and operation of bus services. This represents a significant shift from the deregulated model that has governed most English bus services outside London since the 1980s. Passengers in areas where local authorities choose to use these new powers could see changes to routes, fares, and service reliability, as councils would gain tools to plan networks in the public interest rather than leaving decisions entirely to private operators. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All Labour, Labour and Co-operative, Liberal Democrat, and Green MPs who voted backed the Bill, while every Conservative MP who voted opposed it, along with one Reform UK MP and one independent. The Conservatives have consistently opposed the Bill's approach throughout its Commons stages, arguing it represents unwelcome state intervention in markets. On the same day, MPs rejected two amendments at Report Stage and a third amendment, indicating the government successfully defended the Bill's core text against attempts to alter it before Third Reading.

Voting Aye meant
Support giving councils greater powers to run and regulate local bus services, expanding public oversight of transport
Voting No meant
Oppose increased state and local authority control over bus services, preferring market-led provision
§ 01Who voted how.449 voting Members · 203 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
262
0
99
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
88
28
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
59
0
13
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
27
0
15
Independent
2
1
10
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
1
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
1
0
4
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.3 principal speakers
Simon LightwoodSupportiveWakefield and Rothwell
Government supports Bill's bus reform measures to grow patronage, extend £3 fare cap to 2027, provide franchising powers, and publish guidance on floating bus stops and zero-emission vehicles within three months of Royal Assent.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,778 words)
Ms Nusrat GhaniQuestioningSussex Weald
Opposition proposes numerous new clauses including £2 fare caps, free travel for under-22s and carers, reviews of funding cuts, minimum service standards, and enhanced accountability measures for bus operators and authorities.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (14,271 words)
Jerome MayhewNeutralBroadland and Fakenham
Shadow Minister begins to outline opposition's perspective on the Bill, noting it will be an interesting debate with significant scope for discussion.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (4,090 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0