Railways Bill: Second Reading

Tuesday, 9 December 2025 · Division No. 388 · Commons

329Ayes
173Noes
Passed

146 MPs did not vote

leftGovernment wonPro Rail Nationalisation(Yes)Pro Public Ownership(Yes)Anti Privatisation(Yes)Pro Transport Investment(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support nationalising rail services under public ownership to improve reliability and coordination of the railway network

Voting No means

Oppose rail nationalisation, arguing public ownership has not improved services and that the bill's approach is misguided

What happened: The House of Commons voted on 9 December 2025 to give the Railways Bill its Second Reading, meaning the Bill passes from initial debate to detailed examination at committee stage. The vote passed by 329 Ayes to 173 Noes. Second Reading is the first major Commons vote on a Bill, covering its broad principles rather than specific provisions.

Why it matters: The Railways Bill is the legislative vehicle for creating Great British Railways (GBR), a single public body that would absorb 17 organisations currently involved in running the railway, combining responsibility for track and train under one roof. The Government argues this will simplify fares and ticketing, reduce fragmentation, freeze rail fares (described in debate as the first such freeze in 30 years), establish a new independent passenger watchdog, set a statutory freight growth target, and give mayors and devolved governments a formal role in shaping local services. The Bill builds on the Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Act passed in November 2024, under which seven train operators have already transferred into public hands, with seven more to follow.

The politics: Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted unanimously in favour (284 and 34 respectively), providing the Government's majority. Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru and the Democratic Unionist Party voted entirely against. Reform UK split, with two voting Aye and two voting No. Three Green MPs and five Independents also supported the Bill. On the same day, a Conservative reasoned amendment opposing the Bill on principle was defeated by 332 to 170, confirming the clear government majority. The Bill sits within a broader Labour transport agenda that has also seen the Bus Services (No.2) Bill pass through the Commons in recent months, with opposition amendments consistently defeated by similar margins.

How They Voted

Government position: Aye

Labour PartyWhipped Aye
284 Aye/0 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/94 No
Liberal DemocratsWhipped No
0 Aye/64 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyWhipped Aye
34 Aye/0 No
Independent
5 Aye/4 No
Reform UKFree vote
2 Aye/2 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Plaid CymruWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped Aye
3 Aye/0 No
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1 Aye/0 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
0 Aye/1 No
Your Party
1 Aye/0 No

What They Said in the Debate

Richard Holden

Conservative · Basildon and Billericay

Opposed

Opposes the Bill as ideological state control that weakens independent regulation, eliminates competition from open access operators, increases taxpayer subsidy without guaranteeing better services, and lacks performance standards.

Voted No

Olly Glover

Liberal Democrats · Didcot and Wantage

Opposed

Acknowledges need for rail reform but opposes Bill as written; concerns include lack of passenger growth targets, excessive state micromanagement (citing DfT failures), insufficient protection for open access and freight, and vague criteria for access charges.

Voted No

Joe Robertson

Conservative · Isle of Wight East

Opposed

Opposes full nationalisation; supports uniting track and train (Conservative 2023 plan) but via concessionary model like TfL, not ideology-driven state control, and criticises lack of protections for Isle of Wight ferry connections.

Voted No

Munira Wilson

Liberal Democrats · Twickenham

Questioning

Challenges government claim that nationalisation improves services; points to South Western Railway worsening (delays, cancellations) since public takeover in 2024.

Voted No

Dr Andrew Murrison

Conservative · South West Wiltshire

Questioning

Questions whether passengers care about organisational structure versus tangible improvements; notes 50% increase in SWR cancellations and 29% increase in delays since renationalisation.

Voted No

Heidi Alexander

Labour · Swindon South

Supportive

Supports the Bill as essential reform to unify fragmented railways, eliminate private profit, reduce management costs, and prioritise passengers through public ownership under GBR with stronger passenger watchdog.

Voted Aye

Ruth Cadbury

Labour (Transport Committee Chair) · Brentford and Isleworth

Supportive

Welcomes Bill as overdue reform ending 30 years of fragmentation; welcomes passenger watchdog and accessibility duties but seeks clarification on watchdog independence, disabled passenger protections, and conflict-of-interest safeguards.

Voted Aye

Steve Race

Labour · Exeter

Supportive

Strongly supports Bill; welcomes unified system allowing better planning, increased investment in south-west branches, Devon Metro proposal, and resilience improvements while supporting open access operators.

Voted Aye

Related Votes