A divisionDivision No. 230 · Tuesday, 17 June 2025· Commons· Crime & Policing

Crime and Policing Bill Report Stage: Amendment 19

189Ayes
328Noes
Defeated · majority 139 · Government won
126 did not vote
Aye193No330DID NOT VOTE · 126

643 Members · Aye 189 · No 328 · DNV 126 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on Amendment 19 to the Crime and Policing Bill during its Report Stage on 17 June 2025. The amendment was defeated by 328 votes to 189. Based on the debate, Amendment 19 was grouped with a wide range of proposed changes to the Bill, and the vote reflects the overall division on a package of opposition and cross-party amendments that the government opposed. Every Labour and Labour and Co-operative MP who voted did so against the amendment, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, and smaller parties voted almost entirely in favour. The defeat means the government's original Bill provisions are preserved on the matters covered by Amendment 19 and the associated grouping. The debate around this grouping covered a broad set of policing and criminal justice concerns, including the criminalisation of paying for sex, protections for victims of sexual exploitation, e-bike and e-scooter regulation, knife safety restrictions, joint enterprise law reform, tool theft offences, sex-based harassment in public, equality impact assessments on police powers, and the rights of Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities. None of these cross-party proposals secured enough support to pass against unified Labour opposition. The vote reveals a clear government-versus-opposition dynamic. Labour MPs held the line entirely, with not a single Labour or Labour and Co-operative member voting for the amendment. The Conservatives (101 ayes), Liberal Democrats (68 ayes), and all smaller parties with members present voted in favour. Several amendments in this grouping had notably cross-party authorship, including new clause 43 on sex-based harassment in public, which was co-signed by over 100 MPs from across the House including Labour members, yet the government's whip held firm. A further related division on New Clause 130 concerning tool theft the following day on 18 June 2025 produced a similar result, with 178 ayes and 313 noes, suggesting a consistent pattern of government resistance to this wave of Report Stage amendments.

Voting Aye meant
Support strengthening the new spiking offence by closing a loophole in the legislation to ensure perpetrators cannot exploit a legal gap
Voting No meant
Oppose this specific amendment, likely preferring the government's own version of the spiking offence or believing the loophole concern is addressed elsewhere in the Bill
§ 01Who voted how.517 voting Members · 126 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
298
63
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
101
0
15
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
68
0
4
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
28
14
Independent
6
4
3
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
4
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Dame Diana JohnsonSupportiveKingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
Government minister defending the Bill's measures to tackle crime, antisocial behaviour, and violence against women and girls; arguing the Bill provides essential powers to address gaps in law and protect vulnerable people including emergency workers and children.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (6,557 words)
Matt VickersSupportiveStockton West
Shadow minister welcoming much of the Bill but arguing for stronger measures including increasing knife crime sentencing to 14 years, implementing driving licence penalty points for fly-tippers, and strengthening respect orders with enhanced sanctions.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,618 words)
Sam CarlingQuestioningNorth West Cambridgeshire
Backbencher supporting mandatory reporting but arguing the Bill does not go far enough; specifically advocating for criminal sanctions for non-compliance, extending the duty to all positions of trust as defined in Sexual Offences Act 2003, and broadening triggers to include recognised indicators of abuse.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,957 words)
Simon HoareNeutralNorth Dorset
Warning against treating the Crime Bill as a 'Christmas tree' for unrelated amendments, particularly those on abortion law, which risk fracturing cross-party consensus and require separate, fuller debate.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (532 words)
Wendy MortonQuestioningAldridge-Brownhills
Raising concerns about police funding adequacy, particularly questioning whether national insurance cost increases are properly funded and whether neighbourhood policing numbers represent genuine increases or redeployments.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,375 words)
Chris VinceSupportiveHarlow
Supporting the Bill's measures on neighbourhood policing, begging, and homelessness exploitation; praising new police officers in constituency and defending government record on police staffing.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (208 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0