Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill: New Clause 1
230Ayes
256Noes
Defeated · majority 26162 did not vote
648 Members · Aye 230 · No 256 · DNV 162 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on New Clause 1 to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on 13 June 2025, during the Bill's Report Stage. The clause was defeated by 256 votes to 230. The Bill, promoted by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, would permit terminally ill adults in England and Wales to request assistance to end their lives, subject to a series of medical assessments and High Court approval. The vote matters because New Clause 1 would have added requirements to the Bill that its supporters argued were necessary before it could proceed. Those voting against the clause, and therefore in favour of the Bill as drafted, believed the existing safeguards were sufficient. The defeat means the Bill continues without whatever additional provisions the clause would have introduced. The Bill itself remains a significant piece of proposed legislation that would amend the Suicide Act 1961 and create a new legal framework for assisted dying in England and Wales. The vote cut across party lines, as is typical on matters of conscience. Among Labour MPs, 166 voted against the clause and 111 in favour. Conservatives divided more heavily in favour: 68 voted Aye and 13 voted No. Liberal Democrats voted predominantly against, with 47 Noes and 13 Ayes. The Democratic Unionist Party's five MPs all voted Aye. The Greens' four MPs all voted No. Reform UK split five Ayes to two Noes. No party imposed a whip, and the divisions within each party reflect genuine disagreement on the clause's merits.
Voting Aye meant
Support adding New Clause 1 to the Assisted Dying Bill, associated with calls for stronger safeguards or clearer devolution arrangements before the Bill proceeds
Voting No meant
Reject New Clause 1, backing the Bill as currently drafted by its promoter Kim Leadbeater without the additional requirements the clause would have introduced
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
111
166
84
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
68
13
35
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
13
47
11
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
13
21
8
Independent
—
9
2
2
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
2
1
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
5
0
0
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
1
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Bill sponsor presenting amendments to improve regulatory framework, safeguards, and devolution compliance while ensuring palliative care and assisted dying work alongside each otherLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,870 words) →
Concerned that vulnerable groups (disabled people, ethnic minorities, those with mental health issues) remain insufficiently protected despite amendments; supports greater parliamentary scrutiny through affirmative procedure for statutory instrumentsLiberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,755 words) →
Seeks clarification on devolution implications and conversations with Scottish Government regarding extension of clauses to ScotlandLabour · Voted teller_aye · Read full speech (738 words) →
Questions the evidential basis for the Bill, citing case of terminal patient who exceeded prognosis; expresses concerns about protections for vulnerable groupsDemocratic Unionist Party · Voted aye · Read full speech (375 words) →
Supports new clause 6 proposing special representative for ethnic minorities to ensure fair treatment in assisted dying accessLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (965 words) →
As operating department practitioner, affirms that existing healthcare frameworks and safeguards in the Bill are adequate for drug managementLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (97 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0