Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill: Amendment (b) to New Clause 14

Friday, 13 June 2025 · Division No. 225 · Commons

233Ayes
254Noes
Defeated

164 MPs did not vote

cross-cuttingFree voteAssisted Dying Safeguards(Yes)Pro Coercion Protections(Yes)Assisted Dying Legislation(Yes)Anti Commercial Exploitation Of Dying(Yes)

Voting Yes means

Support a stronger, broader ban on advertising of assisted dying services, emphasising that advertising influences choices and that protecting vulnerable people from coercion requires tighter restrictions

Voting No means

Prefer the existing advertising ban in the bill as drafted by Kim Leadbeater, without the additional strengthening provisions proposed in this amendment

What happened: On 13 June 2025, the House of Commons voted on Amendment (b) to New Clause 14 of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. The amendment was defeated by 254 votes to 233, a margin of 21 votes. This was a free vote, meaning MPs were not required to follow a party line and could vote according to their own conscience and judgment.

Why it matters: New Clause 14 relates to procedural or eligibility requirements within the assisted dying framework the Bill proposes to establish. The amendment sought to modify those requirements in a direction broadly characterised as adding further safeguards or restrictions on access. Its defeat means the clause will proceed without those modifications, leaving the existing provisions in the Bill intact on this point. The practical effect is that the Bill continues on a path favouring broader access to assisted dying for terminally ill adults, rather than the more restrictive approach the amendment would have introduced.

The politics: This was a genuinely cross-cutting vote. Labour MPs split almost evenly, with 109 voting for the amendment and 165 against, while Conservative MPs backed it by 68 to 12. Liberal Democrats overwhelmingly opposed it, voting 48 to 14 against. The Democratic Unionist Party unanimously supported the amendment across its five voting members, and the Greens unanimously opposed it. The vote reflects a broader pattern across this Bill's passage, in which traditional party loyalties have been largely set aside in favour of personal convictions around medical ethics, patient autonomy, and safeguarding.

How They Voted

Government position: Free vote

Labour PartyFree vote
109 Aye/165 No
Conservative and Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
68 Aye/12 No

12 rebels: Alicia Kearns, Andrew Mitchell, Aphra Brandreth, Ashley Fox, Caroline Dinenage, Chris Philp, Kevin Hollinrake, Kit Malthouse + 4 more

Liberal DemocratsFree vote
14 Aye/48 No
Labour and Co-operative PartyFree vote
17 Aye/17 No
Independent
10 Aye/2 No
Reform UKFree vote
5 Aye/2 No
Democratic Unionist PartyWhipped Aye
5 Aye/0 No
Green Party of England and WalesWhipped No
0 Aye/4 No
Plaid CymruFree vote
3 Aye/1 No
Traditional Unionist Voice
1 Aye/0 No
Ulster Unionist Party
1 Aye/0 No
Your Party
1 Aye/0 No

12 MPs voted against their party whip

Related Votes