Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords]: Third Reading
304Ayes
62Noes
Carried · majority 242 · Government won277 did not vote
643 Members · Aye 304 · No 62 · DNV 277 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament passed the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill at its Third Reading on 31 March 2025, by 304 votes to 62. The bill abolishes the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (IfATE) and transfers its functions to the Secretary of State, clearing the legislative path for the government to establish a new body called Skills England. The result was not in doubt: the government commanded a comfortable majority throughout the bill's passage. The bill's practical effect is to remove IfATE as an independent statutory body and place its responsibilities for apprenticeship standards and technical education directly under ministerial control, at least temporarily. Skills England, which the government has described as a central part of its workforce reform agenda, is not established by the bill itself. Critics argued that this leaves a governance gap: the functions once held by an independent arm's-length body now rest with the Secretary of State, with no statutory requirement for parliamentary approval before the new agency is created or for independent oversight of how it operates. The vote divided along clear party lines. All 297 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the bill. The Liberal Democrats provided all 62 no votes, opposing the bill on the grounds that it concentrated power in ministerial hands without adequate parliamentary accountability. The Conservative Party had no votes recorded in this division. Reform UK MPs had no vote recorded either. There were no cross-party rebellions. The Liberal Democrats had also voted against the bill at Second Reading in February 2025, and their new clauses aimed at requiring parliamentary approval for the creation of Skills England were defeated at Report Stage earlier the same day, with the government winning those divisions by margins of roughly 135 votes.
Voting Aye meant
Support passing the bill, accepting that transferring apprenticeship and technical education functions to the Secretary of State is a necessary step toward creating Skills England, even without statutory parliamentary approval mechanisms built into the legislation.
Voting No meant
Oppose passing the bill in its current form, arguing it centralises power in the Secretary of State without adequate parliamentary oversight, creates a governance vacuum, and fails to properly establish Skills England or ensure its independence from ministerial control.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
263
0
98
Conservative and Unionist Party
—
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
0
63
8
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
34
0
8
Independent
—
4
1
8
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
—
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports new clause 1 requiring parliamentary approval of Skills England proposals before establishment; argues the Bill centralises power without proper accountability mechanismsLiberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (2,508 words) →
Supports new clause 4 to establish Skills England as independent statutory body; warns that independence from government protects standards from political interference and ensures guaranteed business voiceConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,550 words) →
Opposes new clauses 1 and 4; argues independence of IfATE led to failure and that departmental control enables speed and responsiveness to employer needsLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,604 words) →
Opposes amendments and delay; argues preparatory work is complete and passing the Bill quickly is needed to train apprentices urgentlyLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (508 words) →
Supports new clause 1; argues government needs clear plan for Skills England and emphasises apprentices deserve adequate wages and proper career supportLiberal Democrat · Voted no · Read full speech (714 words) →
Opposes amendments; acknowledges merit in concerns but argues direction of government policy on flexibility and coherence is sound and could succeed without structural independenceLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,954 words) →
Opposes amendment 6; argues delay is irresponsible given UK productivity gap and need to end skills system fragmentation quicklyLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (816 words) →
Opposes amendments; argues accepting them risks recreating IfATE under a new name and that the status quo skills system is not fit for purposeLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,315 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0