A divisionDivision No. 163 · Monday, 31 March 2025· Commons· Skills and Training

Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] Report Stage: Amendment 6

166Ayes
305Noes
Defeated · majority 139 · Government won
175 did not vote
Aye166No308DID NOT VOTE · 175

646 Members · Aye 166 · No 305 · DNV 175 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 31 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on Amendment 6 to the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill at Report Stage. The amendment was defeated by 305 votes to 166. The Bill itself concerns abolishing the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (IfATE) and transferring its functions to the Secretary of State and Skills England, a new government body. The amendment sought to introduce additional safeguards or consultation requirements around the transfer of apprenticeship and technical education oversight from IfATE to Skills England and ministerial control. Those backing it argued the change concentrated too much power in government hands without adequate checks. The vote's defeat means the government's preferred approach to reorganising skills and apprenticeship governance will proceed largely as planned, affecting employers, training providers, and learners across England who rely on the standards and funding frameworks that IfATE currently administers. The vote divided sharply along government and opposition lines. All Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the government against the amendment, while Conservatives (95) and Liberal Democrats (62) voted unanimously in favour of it, joined by smaller numbers from the DUP, Reform UK, the Ulster Unionist Party, and Traditional Unionist Voice. There were no cross-party rebels on either side. This vote was one of several defeats for opposition amendments on the same day, with related votes on New Clause 1 and New Clause 4 producing similar results, before the Bill passed its Third Reading by 304 votes to 62.

Voting Aye meant
Support giving Skills England a one-year operational period before it takes on IfATE's functions, arguing this cautious approach reduces implementation risk and protects apprenticeship and technical education quality during the transition.
Voting No meant
Oppose the delay, preferring to proceed with the transfer of functions without a mandated one-year waiting period, prioritising swift delivery of the new skills system.
§ 01Who voted how.471 voting Members · 175 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
265
96
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
95
0
21
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
62
0
10
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
36
6
Independent
0
4
9
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
3
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.8 principal speakers
Ian SollomOpposedSt Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire
Supports new clause 1 requiring parliamentary approval of Skills England proposals before establishment; argues the Bill centralises power without proper accountability mechanismsLiberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,508 words)
Damian HindsOpposedEast Hampshire
Supports new clause 4 to establish Skills England as independent statutory body; warns that independence from government protects standards from political interference and ensures guaranteed business voiceConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,550 words)
Andrew PakesSupportivePeterborough
Opposes new clauses 1 and 4; argues independence of IfATE led to failure and that departmental control enables speed and responsiveness to employer needsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,604 words)
Pam CoxSupportiveColchester
Opposes amendments and delay; argues preparatory work is complete and passing the Bill quickly is needed to train apprentices urgentlyLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (508 words)
Sarah OlneyOpposedRichmond Park
Supports new clause 1; argues government needs clear plan for Skills England and emphasises apprentices deserve adequate wages and proper career supportLiberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (714 words)
Toby PerkinsSupportiveChesterfield
Opposes amendments; acknowledges merit in concerns but argues direction of government policy on flexibility and coherence is sound and could succeed without structural independenceLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,954 words)
Peter SwallowSupportiveBracknell
Opposes amendment 6; argues delay is irresponsible given UK productivity gap and need to end skills system fragmentation quicklyLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (816 words)
Laurence TurnerSupportiveBirmingham Northfield
Opposes amendments; argues accepting them risks recreating IfATE under a new name and that the status quo skills system is not fit for purposeLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,315 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0