Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] Report Stage: New Clause 4
167Ayes
306Noes
Defeated · majority 139 · Government won175 did not vote
648 Members · Aye 167 · No 306 · DNV 175 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 31 March 2025 on New Clause 4 to the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill at Report Stage. The new clause would have established Skills England as an independent statutory body corporate, separate from direct ministerial control, and required the Secretary of State to transfer functions to it by regulation within a year of the Act passing. The motion was defeated by 306 votes to 167. The vote decided whether Skills England, which absorbs the functions of the abolished Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (IfATE), would operate at arm's length from government or remain under the direct authority of the Secretary of State. Under the Bill as passed, ministers retain direct control over the body's functions. Supporters of the new clause argued that statutory independence is essential to protect the credibility and integrity of skills qualifications, particularly apprenticeship standards. Opponents argued that placing Skills England under ministerial control allows faster delivery of reform in a sector they said had suffered falling apprenticeship starts under the previous government. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 263 Labour MPs and all 35 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the new clause. Conservatives (95), Liberal Democrats (64), Reform UK (4), the Democratic Unionist Party (4), the Ulster Unionist Party (1), and Traditional Unionist Voice (1) all voted in favour. The Greens voted against, and four Independents voted against. There were no cross-party rebels recorded on either side. The result mirrors two closely related divisions on the same day: New Clause 1 (defeated 168 to 302) and Amendment 6 (defeated 166 to 305), both of which also sought to strengthen the independence or accountability of Skills England.
Voting Aye meant
Support making Skills England a legally independent body, separate from direct ministerial control, to safeguard the integrity of skills and apprenticeship qualifications.
Voting No meant
Oppose statutory independence for Skills England, arguing that keeping it under the Secretary of State allows faster delivery of skills reform and a stronger government hand in tackling falling apprenticeship numbers.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
263
98
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
95
0
21
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
63
0
8
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
35
7
Independent
—
1
4
8
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
4
0
3
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports new clause 1 requiring parliamentary approval of Skills England proposals before establishment; argues the Bill centralises power without proper accountability mechanismsLiberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,508 words) →
Supports new clause 4 to establish Skills England as independent statutory body; warns that independence from government protects standards from political interference and ensures guaranteed business voiceConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,550 words) →
Opposes new clauses 1 and 4; argues independence of IfATE led to failure and that departmental control enables speed and responsiveness to employer needsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,604 words) →
Opposes amendments and delay; argues preparatory work is complete and passing the Bill quickly is needed to train apprentices urgentlyLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (508 words) →
Supports new clause 1; argues government needs clear plan for Skills England and emphasises apprentices deserve adequate wages and proper career supportLiberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (714 words) →
Opposes amendments; acknowledges merit in concerns but argues direction of government policy on flexibility and coherence is sound and could succeed without structural independenceLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,954 words) →
Opposes amendment 6; argues delay is irresponsible given UK productivity gap and need to end skills system fragmentation quicklyLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (816 words) →
Opposes amendments; argues accepting them risks recreating IfATE under a new name and that the status quo skills system is not fit for purposeLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,315 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0