Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill: Third Reading
382Ayes
104Noes
Carried · majority 278 · Government won161 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 382 · No 104 · DNV 161 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The House of Commons passed the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill at its Third Reading (the final Commons vote before a bill passes to the House of Lords) on 18 March 2025. The vote was 382 in favour and 104 against. Third Reading is the last opportunity for MPs to vote on whether a bill should proceed, and passing it here means the legislation moves on to face scrutiny in the Lords. The bill introduces wide-ranging reforms to children's services and school oversight in England, including changes to how local authorities manage children in care and how schools are regulated and supported. It affects children's social workers, schools, local councils, and families across the country. Practically, it advances the government's agenda on child welfare and education accountability, reshaping the relationship between central government, local authorities, and schools. The vote divided almost entirely along party lines. All 284 Labour MPs and 31 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted backed the bill, as did all 57 Liberal Democrat MPs present and the three Green MPs. All 95 voting Conservatives opposed it, joined by four Reform UK MPs, three Democratic Unionist Party MPs, and one Ulster Unionist. Two independents also voted against. There were no notable cross-party rebellions. The bill sits within a broader Labour legislative push on education, running alongside the government's moves to remove private schools' business rate relief and reform technical education, both of which have faced sustained opposition and Lords resistance in the same parliamentary period.
Voting Aye meant
Support passing the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill into law, backing Labour's reforms to child protection, school standards, and support for looked-after children
Voting No meant
Oppose the bill in its current form, likely citing concerns about specific provisions such as school regulation, data handling, or the overall approach to children's services
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
283
0
78
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
95
21
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
57
0
15
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
31
0
11
Independent
—
6
2
5
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
4
3
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
3
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Your Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Bill prioritizes child safety, education standards, and opportunity; government amendments strengthen data protection and extend provisions to Wales while respecting home education parents doing right thingLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,425 words) →
Bill strips freedoms from academies on curriculum and recruitment, removes accountability via automatic academy conversion, and gives local authorities power to restrict popular schools, undermining 40 years of cross-party education reformConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (4,082 words) →
Schools in her area (Walsall) have improved significantly under Conservative governance; questions whether government amendments represent real progressConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (118 words) →
Bill removes curriculum flexibility that allows schools like Michaela to tailor provision for disadvantaged pupils; curriculum freedoms are essential; home education registration requirements risk being disproportionately onerousConservative · Voted no · Read full speech (3,399 words) →
Bill restores coherence to admissions planning, reduces school uniform costs, introduces home education register to prevent child safeguarding failures, and expands breakfast provision; welcomes free school meals auto-enrolment measuresLabour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,688 words) →
Calls for investment in outdoor education as part of mental health response and curriculum enrichmentLiberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (158 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0