A divisionDivision No. 127 · Tuesday, 18 March 2025· Commons· Schools

Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill Report Stage: New Clause 7

77Ayes
313Noes
Defeated · majority 236 · Government won
258 did not vote
Aye78No312DID NOT VOTE · 258

648 Members · Aye 77 · No 313 · DNV 258 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

The House of Commons voted on 18 March 2025 on New Clause 7, a proposed addition to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill at Report Stage (the stage where MPs can propose detailed amendments to a bill that has passed committee). The clause was defeated by 313 votes to 77. The government opposed the new clause, and Labour MPs voted overwhelmingly against it, with only one Labour MP supporting it. The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill is a significant piece of legislation covering child protection and school standards in England. New Clause 7 sought to add further specific provisions to that framework, but the government and its parliamentary majority judged that the existing bill already addressed the relevant concerns, or that the proposed addition was not appropriate for inclusion. The defeat means the clause will not form part of the bill as it continues through Parliament, leaving the policy area it targeted without the additional statutory footing its supporters sought. The vote revealed a clear cross-party opposition to the government's position, though not one strong enough to prevail. The Liberal Democrats provided the largest bloc of Aye votes with 59, joined by smaller contributions from independents, the Democratic Unionist Party, the Greens, Reform UK, the Ulster Unionist Party, and others. Labour held firm with 279 votes against, with the Labour and Co-operative Party adding a further 30. Only one Labour MP broke with the party to support the clause. The result illustrates the government's comfortable working majority on education legislation, even when facing a broad but numerically limited cross-party coalition.

Voting Aye meant
Support stronger measures on school food, such as automatic enrolment for free school meals or a national monitoring scheme for food standards in schools
Voting No meant
Oppose adding these specific school food requirements to the bill, preferring the government's existing approach or separate policy mechanisms
§ 01Who voted how.390 voting Members · 258 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
1
278
82
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
59
0
13
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
30
12
Independent
5
4
4
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
3
0
4
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
1
0
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Catherine McKinnellSupportiveNewcastle upon Tyne North
Bill prioritizes child safety, education standards, and opportunity; government amendments strengthen data protection and extend provisions to Wales while respecting home education parents doing right thingLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,425 words)
Neil O'BrienOpposedHarborough, Oadby and Wigston
Bill strips freedoms from academies on curriculum and recruitment, removes accountability via automatic academy conversion, and gives local authorities power to restrict popular schools, undermining 40 years of cross-party education reformConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (4,082 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Schools in her area (Walsall) have improved significantly under Conservative governance; questions whether government amendments represent real progressConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (118 words)
Graham StuartOpposedBeverley and Holderness
Bill removes curriculum flexibility that allows schools like Michaela to tailor provision for disadvantaged pupils; curriculum freedoms are essential; home education registration requirements risk being disproportionately onerousConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (3,399 words)
Helen HayesSupportiveDulwich and West Norwood
Bill restores coherence to admissions planning, reduces school uniform costs, introduces home education register to prevent child safeguarding failures, and expands breakfast provision; welcomes free school meals auto-enrolment measuresLabour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,688 words)
Tim FarronQuestioningWestmorland and Lonsdale
Calls for investment in outdoor education as part of mental health response and curriculum enrichmentLiberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (158 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0