Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill Report Stage: New Clause 7
77Ayes
313Noes
Defeated · majority 236 · Government won258 did not vote
648 Members · Aye 77 · No 313 · DNV 258 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 18 March 2025 on New Clause 7, a Liberal Democrat proposal to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill at report stage (the stage where MPs debate and vote on amendments before a bill passes to the House of Lords). The new clause would have required the Secretary of State to ensure free school meals were available to children from households earning under £20,000 a year and to automatically enrol eligible children in the provision, removing the need for families to apply. The motion was defeated by 313 votes to 77. The practical effect of the proposal would have been to extend free school meal eligibility to children in households below a £20,000 income threshold and to remove the existing requirement for families to actively request the benefit. Supporters argued that children in poverty would be better able to concentrate and learn if they were fed, and that automatic enrolment would reach families who are eligible but do not currently claim. The government opposed the measure, preferring its own approach, which includes a duty under the bill for state primary schools to provide free breakfast clubs. The Liberal Democrats voted unanimously for the new clause, with 59 of their MPs supporting it and none against. Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs voted against by 308 to 1, providing the bulk of the opposition. Smaller parties including the Democratic Unionist Party, Reform UK, the Green Party, and two independent-affiliated groupings voted for the clause. The vote sits within a broader debate at report stage about child hunger and poverty, with several related new clauses on free school meals tabled by MPs across different parties.
Voting Aye meant
Support automatically enrolling low-income children in free school meals and expanding eligibility to households earning under £20,000, reducing child poverty and hunger in schools
Voting No meant
Oppose the automatic enrolment proposal, either on cost grounds or preferring the Government's existing approach to free school meals and breakfast club provision
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
1
278
82
Conservative and Unionist Party
—
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
59
0
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
30
12
Independent
—
4
4
5
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
3
0
4
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
2
0
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Bill prioritizes child safety, education standards, and opportunity; government amendments strengthen data protection and extend provisions to Wales while respecting home education parents doing right thingLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,425 words) →
Bill strips freedoms from academies on curriculum and recruitment, removes accountability via automatic academy conversion, and gives local authorities power to restrict popular schools, undermining 40 years of cross-party education reformConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (4,082 words) →
Schools in her area (Walsall) have improved significantly under Conservative governance; questions whether government amendments represent real progressConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (118 words) →
Bill removes curriculum flexibility that allows schools like Michaela to tailor provision for disadvantaged pupils; curriculum freedoms are essential; home education registration requirements risk being disproportionately onerousConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (3,399 words) →
Bill restores coherence to admissions planning, reduces school uniform costs, introduces home education register to prevent child safeguarding failures, and expands breakfast provision; welcomes free school meals auto-enrolment measuresLabour · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,688 words) →
Calls for investment in outdoor education as part of mental health response and curriculum enrichmentLiberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (158 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0