Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill Report Stage: New Clause 34
77Ayes
315Noes
Defeated · majority 238 · Government won255 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 77 · No 315 · DNV 255 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 18 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 34 during the Report Stage of the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill. The clause, which proposed additional protections or services for children's welfare beyond those already included in the government's bill, was defeated by 315 votes to 77. Report Stage is the point at which MPs debate and vote on proposed changes to a bill after it has been examined in committee. The defeat of New Clause 34 means the additional children's welfare provisions it proposed will not be included in the legislation as it progresses. The government's own framework for children's wellbeing and schools policy remains intact without the amendments the clause would have introduced. The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill is a significant piece of legislation affecting children's services, schools, and safeguarding across England, so decisions about what is and is not included shape the practical protections available to children and the obligations placed on schools and local authorities. The vote divided largely along government versus opposition lines. The Liberal Democrats provided the bulk of the Aye votes, with all 60 of their voting members supporting the new clause. The Greens and several independents also voted in favour. The Labour Party and its Co-operative Party allies voted overwhelmingly against, in line with the government's position, with 305 combined No votes. Notably, 7 Labour MPs broke from the government and voted Aye, representing a small but visible rebellion. The Democratic Unionist Party and Reform UK also voted No, producing an unusual alignment between those parties and the Labour government. The result reflects the government's commanding majority and its resistance to opposition attempts to expand the bill's scope beyond its existing provisions.
Voting Aye meant
Support extending free school meals to all primary school children universally
Voting No meant
Oppose universal free school meals for all primary children, preferring the existing means-tested system
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
7
274
80
Conservative and Unionist Party
—
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
60
0
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
30
12
Independent
—
6
3
4
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
3
4
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
1
0
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Bill prioritizes child safety, education standards, and opportunity; government amendments strengthen data protection and extend provisions to Wales while respecting home education parents doing right thingLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,425 words) →
Bill strips freedoms from academies on curriculum and recruitment, removes accountability via automatic academy conversion, and gives local authorities power to restrict popular schools, undermining 40 years of cross-party education reformConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (4,082 words) →
Schools in her area (Walsall) have improved significantly under Conservative governance; questions whether government amendments represent real progressConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (118 words) →
Bill removes curriculum flexibility that allows schools like Michaela to tailor provision for disadvantaged pupils; curriculum freedoms are essential; home education registration requirements risk being disproportionately onerousConservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (3,399 words) →
Bill restores coherence to admissions planning, reduces school uniform costs, introduces home education register to prevent child safeguarding failures, and expands breakfast provision; welcomes free school meals auto-enrolment measuresLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,688 words) →
Calls for investment in outdoor education as part of mental health response and curriculum enrichmentLiberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (158 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0