Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill Report Stage: Amendment 210
167Ayes
324Noes
Defeated · majority 157 · Government won157 did not vote
648 Members · Aye 167 · No 324 · DNV 157 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The House of Commons voted on Amendment 210 to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill during its Report Stage on 18 March 2025. The amendment was defeated by 324 votes to 167. Report Stage is the phase where the full House of Commons examines a bill after it has been scrutinised in committee, and members can propose further changes to the text. The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill is a significant piece of legislation covering education and child welfare policy in England. Amendment 210 sought to modify the government's approach, with opposition parties arguing it would strengthen provisions relating to children's wellbeing or schools. By defeating the amendment, the government preserved its preferred version of the bill, keeping its original policy approach intact and preventing the changes the opposition sought to introduce. The vote divided sharply along government-versus-opposition lines. All Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted did so against the amendment, while Conservatives (95 votes), Liberal Democrats (60 votes), Reform UK (5 votes), the Democratic Unionist Party (4 votes), and the Ulster Unionist Party (1 vote) supported it. The Greens joined the government in opposing it, casting 3 votes against. Two independents voted for the amendment and four against. There were no notable cross-party rebellions within the governing Labour bloc. This vote sits within a broader pattern of education-related divisions in early 2025, including parallel battles over private school business rates in the Non-Domestic Rating Bill, where the government repeatedly used its Commons majority to resist Lords and opposition amendments.
Voting Aye meant
Support giving an independent route to resolve school admission number disputes, ensuring schools meet local demand for places
Voting No meant
Oppose this mechanism for independent adjudication of school admission numbers, preferring existing local arrangements
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
283
78
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
95
0
21
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
60
0
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
31
11
Independent
—
2
5
6
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Bill prioritizes child safety, education standards, and opportunity; government amendments strengthen data protection and extend provisions to Wales while respecting home education parents doing right thingLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,425 words) →
Bill strips freedoms from academies on curriculum and recruitment, removes accountability via automatic academy conversion, and gives local authorities power to restrict popular schools, undermining 40 years of cross-party education reformConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,082 words) →
Schools in her area (Walsall) have improved significantly under Conservative governance; questions whether government amendments represent real progressConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (118 words) →
Bill removes curriculum flexibility that allows schools like Michaela to tailor provision for disadvantaged pupils; curriculum freedoms are essential; home education registration requirements risk being disproportionately onerousConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,399 words) →
Bill restores coherence to admissions planning, reduces school uniform costs, introduces home education register to prevent child safeguarding failures, and expands breakfast provision; welcomes free school meals auto-enrolment measuresLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,688 words) →
Calls for investment in outdoor education as part of mental health response and curriculum enrichmentLiberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (158 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0