A divisionDivision No. 129 · Tuesday, 18 March 2025· Commons· Schools

Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill Report Stage: Amendment 209

107Ayes
324Noes
Defeated · majority 217 · Government won
214 did not vote
Aye109No325DID NOT VOTE · 214

645 Members · Aye 107 · No 324 · DNV 214 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

On 18 March 2025, the House of Commons voted on Amendment 209 to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill during its Report Stage (the stage at which MPs debate and vote on proposed changes to a bill before its final reading). The amendment was defeated by 324 votes to 107. The amendment sought to modify the government's approach in the bill by introducing additional safeguards or provisions relating to children's services or educational provision. The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill is a significant piece of legislation covering a broad range of policy areas affecting children in England, from child protection and social care to school admissions and educational standards. Amendment 209 would have altered the bill's existing framework, potentially adding new requirements or constraints on how services are structured or delivered. Its defeat means the government's original approach to the relevant provisions remains intact, and the additional safeguards proposed by opposition MPs will not be incorporated into the bill at this stage. The vote divided largely along party lines. All 318 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the amendment, while Conservatives provided the bulk of the 107 ayes, joined by Reform UK members, the Democratic Unionist Party, the Ulster Unionist Party, and Traditional Unionist Voice. The Green Party voted with the government against the amendment. Three independents voted on each side. The result reflects the government's commanding Commons majority, which has allowed it to see off opposition attempts to reshape the bill throughout its passage, a pattern also visible in related divisions on education and schools legislation during the same parliamentary period.

Voting Aye meant
Support automatically enrolling eligible children in free school meals and improving monitoring of school food standards, reducing barriers for families in need
Voting No meant
Oppose these specific amendments, likely preferring the existing application-based system or questioning the scope and cost of the proposed changes
§ 01Who voted how.431 voting Members · 214 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
286
75
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
95
0
21
Liberal Democrats
0
0
72
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
31
11
Independent
3
4
6
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
0
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
1
0
0
Your Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Catherine McKinnellSupportiveNewcastle upon Tyne North
Bill prioritizes child safety, education standards, and opportunity; government amendments strengthen data protection and extend provisions to Wales while respecting home education parents doing right thingLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,425 words)
Neil O'BrienOpposedHarborough, Oadby and Wigston
Bill strips freedoms from academies on curriculum and recruitment, removes accountability via automatic academy conversion, and gives local authorities power to restrict popular schools, undermining 40 years of cross-party education reformConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (4,082 words)
Wendy MortonOpposedAldridge-Brownhills
Schools in her area (Walsall) have improved significantly under Conservative governance; questions whether government amendments represent real progressConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (118 words)
Graham StuartOpposedBeverley and Holderness
Bill removes curriculum flexibility that allows schools like Michaela to tailor provision for disadvantaged pupils; curriculum freedoms are essential; home education registration requirements risk being disproportionately onerousConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (3,399 words)
Helen HayesSupportiveDulwich and West Norwood
Bill restores coherence to admissions planning, reduces school uniform costs, introduces home education register to prevent child safeguarding failures, and expands breakfast provision; welcomes free school meals auto-enrolment measuresLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,688 words)
Tim FarronQuestioningWestmorland and Lonsdale
Calls for investment in outdoor education as part of mental health response and curriculum enrichmentLiberal Democrat · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (158 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0