A divisionDivision No. 126 · Monday, 17 March 2025· Commons· Schools

Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill Report Stage: Amendment 171

65Ayes
317Noes
Defeated · majority 252 · Government won
269 did not vote
Aye63No317DID NOT VOTE · 269

651 Members · Aye 65 · No 317 · DNV 269 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

The House of Commons voted on Amendment 171 to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill at Report Stage on 17 March 2025. The amendment was defeated by 317 votes to 65. Report Stage is the phase at which MPs can propose specific changes to a bill after it has been examined in committee. The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill is a substantial piece of legislation covering children's services and school policy. Amendment 171 proposed an alternative approach to one or more of its provisions, and its defeat means the bill continues on the path set out by the government rather than incorporating the changes the amendment sought. The practical effect depends on the specific provisions targeted, but the scale of the defeat means there was no serious prospect of the amendment succeeding. The Liberal Democrats were the principal force behind the amendment, providing 55 of the 65 Aye votes, with small contributions from the Greens (3), Reform UK (2), and two independents. Labour and the Labour and Co-operative Party voted unanimously against, delivering the 317 Noes. Notably, all 116 Conservative MPs were absent from this division entirely, meaning the official opposition did not participate. This cross-cutting pattern, with the Liberal Democrats leading opposition on a children's and schools measure, reflects the broader positioning of smaller parties seeking to shape flagship government legislation during its passage.

Voting Aye meant
Support extending the profit cap to independent special schools to prevent providers exploiting a broken SEND market at the expense of children and councils
Voting No meant
Oppose applying the profit cap to independent special schools at this stage, preferring a broader whole-system reform of SEND rather than piecemeal changes
§ 01Who voted how.382 voting Members · 269 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
282
79
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
55
0
17
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
31
11
Independent
2
2
10
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
2
0
5
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
0
0
5
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1
Your Party
0
1
0

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Stephen MorganSupportivePortsmouth South
Government Minister defending new clauses on corporate parenting duties (18-22) and explaining amendments on information sharing and financial oversight; emphasises landmark reforms to children's social care and keeping families together where appropriate.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,409 words)
Neil O'BrienOpposedHarborough, Oadby and Wigston
Opposes government's approach to phone bans in schools, arguing new clause 36 for full statutory ban is essential; criticises Education Secretary for contradictory messaging and claims guidance alone is failing; pushes government to support phone ban amendment.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,693 words)
Helen HayesSupportiveDulwich and West Norwood
Supports new clauses 3 and 4 on national care offer and mental health assessments in care; emphasises poor outcomes for care leavers and postcode lottery in support; calls for stronger accountability and consistency.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,291 words)
Munira WilsonQuestioningTwickenham
Advocates for new clauses 25-28 on kinship care leave, allowances, pupil premium extension, and school admissions; argues kinship carers need parity with foster carers and that current proposals fall short of ambition.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,253 words)
Jim ShannonQuestioningStrangford
Raises concern about support for children with dyslexia, autism and behavioural challenges in the context of corporate parenting duties.DUP · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (194 words)
Chris VinceQuestioningHarlow
Raises importance of supporting young carers and notes need for mobile phone carve-outs for health devices and those in caring roles.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (180 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0