Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill Report Stage: Amendment 188
160Ayes
319Noes
Defeated · majority 159 · Government won168 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 160 · No 319 · DNV 168 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
The House of Commons voted on Amendment 188 to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill during its Report Stage on 17 March 2025. The amendment, which sought to strengthen provisions in the Bill beyond what the government proposed, was defeated by 319 votes to 160. The Bill itself is a significant piece of legislation covering children's services, safeguarding and school standards in England. The amendment would have added further measures to a Bill already designed to reform how schools and children's services operate in England. By voting it down, the Commons backed the government's existing version of the Bill rather than the expanded form proposed by the amendment. The legislation as a whole affects a wide range of people, including schoolchildren, parents, local authorities responsible for children's services, and schools across the state and independent sectors. The vote divided sharply along party lines. Labour MPs voted unanimously against the amendment, defending the government's own proposals, while Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, Reform UK and the Democratic Unionist Party all voted in favour. No Labour MP broke ranks. This reflects the broader pattern of opposition parties seeking to amend flagship government legislation at Report Stage, a point in the parliamentary process when the full House considers changes to a Bill after it has left committee. The vote sits alongside a cluster of related education divisions in early 2025, including disputes over business rates on private schools, suggesting education policy remains a sustained battleground between the government and opposition parties.
Voting Aye meant
Support the amendment (likely an opposition or backbench proposal) on corporate parenting duties or the National Care Offer, seeking stronger or differently framed statutory protections for children in care
Voting No meant
Reject the amendment in favour of the government's own new clauses (19–22) on corporate parenting responsibilities, which the government considered sufficient
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
281
80
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
93
0
23
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
59
0
13
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
31
11
Independent
—
2
2
10
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
0
1
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government Minister defending new clauses on corporate parenting duties (18-22) and explaining amendments on information sharing and financial oversight; emphasises landmark reforms to children's social care and keeping families together where appropriate.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,409 words) →
Opposes government's approach to phone bans in schools, arguing new clause 36 for full statutory ban is essential; criticises Education Secretary for contradictory messaging and claims guidance alone is failing; pushes government to support phone ban amendment.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,693 words) →
Supports new clauses 3 and 4 on national care offer and mental health assessments in care; emphasises poor outcomes for care leavers and postcode lottery in support; calls for stronger accountability and consistency.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,291 words) →
Advocates for new clauses 25-28 on kinship care leave, allowances, pupil premium extension, and school admissions; argues kinship carers need parity with foster carers and that current proposals fall short of ambition.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,253 words) →
Raises concern about support for children with dyslexia, autism and behavioural challenges in the context of corporate parenting duties.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (194 words) →
Raises importance of supporting young carers and notes need for mobile phone carve-outs for health devices and those in caring roles.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (180 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0