A divisionDivision No. 125 · Monday, 17 March 2025· Commons· Schools

Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill Report Stage: Amendment 188

160Ayes
319Noes
Defeated · majority 159 · Government won
168 did not vote
Aye162No319DID NOT VOTE · 168

647 Members · Aye 160 · No 319 · DNV 168 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Amendment 188 to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill was defeated at Report Stage on 17 March 2025, with 319 MPs voting against and 160 in favour. The amendment was tabled by opposition or backbench MPs and voted down by the government's Commons majority. The detailed content of Amendment 188 is not fully set out in the available Hansard record for this division. The debate group in which it sat covered corporate parenting duties, care leaver support, and related children's social care provisions, including government new clauses on corporate parenting responsibilities and collaborative working, as well as a separate new clause that would have required the Secretary of State to publish a National Care Offer setting minimum standards for local authority care leaver information. The bill as a whole extends support for care leavers up to age 25 and strengthens the statutory framework around children's social care providers, family group decision-making, and multi-agency child protection. The vote divided sharply along party lines. Every Labour and Labour and Co-operative MP who voted backed the No lobby, providing the bulk of the 319 votes against. The 160 Ayes came primarily from Conservative MPs (93) and Liberal Democrats (59), with small numbers from Reform UK (5), the Democratic Unionist Party (2), and two independents. No Labour MP voted Aye, and no Conservative or Liberal Democrat MP voted No. The result reflects the government's comfortable working majority and the opposition parties' alignment in supporting the amendment against the bill as drafted.

Voting Aye meant
Support the specific change proposed in Amendment 188 to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, tabled by opposition or backbench MPs against the government's preferred approach to children's social care or schools provisions.
Voting No meant
Reject Amendment 188, backing the government's existing Bill text on children's social care, corporate parenting, or related provisions rather than the amendment's alternative approach.
§ 01Who voted how.479 voting Members · 168 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
281
80
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
93
0
23
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
59
0
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
31
11
Independent
2
2
10
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
3
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Your Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.6 principal speakers
Stephen MorganSupportivePortsmouth South
Government Minister defending new clauses on corporate parenting duties (18-22) and explaining amendments on information sharing and financial oversight; emphasises landmark reforms to children's social care and keeping families together where appropriate.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,409 words)
Neil O'BrienOpposedHarborough, Oadby and Wigston
Opposes government's approach to phone bans in schools, arguing new clause 36 for full statutory ban is essential; criticises Education Secretary for contradictory messaging and claims guidance alone is failing; pushes government to support phone ban amendment.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,693 words)
Helen HayesSupportiveDulwich and West Norwood
Supports new clauses 3 and 4 on national care offer and mental health assessments in care; emphasises poor outcomes for care leavers and postcode lottery in support; calls for stronger accountability and consistency.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,291 words)
Munira WilsonQuestioningTwickenham
Advocates for new clauses 25-28 on kinship care leave, allowances, pupil premium extension, and school admissions; argues kinship carers need parity with foster carers and that current proposals fall short of ambition.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,253 words)
Jim ShannonQuestioningStrangford
Raises concern about support for children with dyslexia, autism and behavioural challenges in the context of corporate parenting duties.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (194 words)
Chris VinceQuestioningHarlow
Raises importance of supporting young carers and notes need for mobile phone carve-outs for health devices and those in caring roles.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (180 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0