Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill Report Stage: New Clause 36
159Ayes
317Noes
Defeated · majority 158 · Government won170 did not vote
646 Members · Aye 159 · No 317 · DNV 170 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
MPs voted down a Conservative amendment to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill on 17 March 2025. New Clause 36, tabled by the Conservative MP for Sevenoaks Laura Trott, would have banned mobile phones in schools and required the chief medical officer to produce a report on the effects of social media on children's mental health, alongside a government research requirement. The amendment was defeated by 317 votes to 159. The practical effect of the vote is that a statutory phone ban in schools will not be introduced through this Bill. The government's existing approach relies on non-statutory guidance to schools rather than legislation. A requirement for the chief medical officer to formally assess social media's impact on children's mental health was also rejected. The Bill continues toward becoming law without either provision. Every Labour and Labour and Co-operative Party MP who voted did so against the amendment, providing the government's majority. The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats both voted unanimously in favour. Reform UK, the Green Party, the Democratic Unionist Party, and the Traditional Unionist Voice also backed the amendment. Neil O'Brien for the Conservatives led the argument for the new clause, describing the evidence of harm to children's mental health as already alarming. The vote sits within the Bill's Report Stage, a point at which MPs propose additions before the legislation moves to the Lords.
Voting Aye meant
Support banning mobile phones in schools and requiring official research into social media's effects on children's mental health
Voting No meant
Oppose legislating a phone ban at this stage, preferring the government's existing non-statutory guidance approach rather than a statutory requirement
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
284
77
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
91
0
25
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
59
0
12
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
31
11
Independent
—
1
2
11
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
—
2
0
2
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Your Party
—
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
0
1
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government Minister defending new clauses on corporate parenting duties (18-22) and explaining amendments on information sharing and financial oversight; emphasises landmark reforms to children's social care and keeping families together where appropriate.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,409 words) →
Opposes government's approach to phone bans in schools, arguing new clause 36 for full statutory ban is essential; criticises Education Secretary for contradictory messaging and claims guidance alone is failing; pushes government to support phone ban amendment.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,693 words) →
Supports new clauses 3 and 4 on national care offer and mental health assessments in care; emphasises poor outcomes for care leavers and postcode lottery in support; calls for stronger accountability and consistency.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,291 words) →
Advocates for new clauses 25-28 on kinship care leave, allowances, pupil premium extension, and school admissions; argues kinship carers need parity with foster carers and that current proposals fall short of ambition.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,253 words) →
Raises concern about support for children with dyslexia, autism and behavioural challenges in the context of corporate parenting duties.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (194 words) →
Raises importance of supporting young carers and notes need for mobile phone carve-outs for health devices and those in caring roles.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (180 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0