Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill Report Stage: New Clause 36
159Ayes
317Noes
Defeated · majority 158 · Government won170 did not vote
646 Members · Aye 159 · No 317 · DNV 170 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 17 March 2025, MPs voted on New Clause 36, a proposed addition to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill during its Report Stage (the stage at which the full House of Commons debates and votes on amendments to a bill). The clause would have expanded provisions for children's welfare or educational support beyond what the government had already included in the bill. The motion was defeated by 317 votes to 159. The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill is a significant piece of legislation affecting the education and welfare of children in England. New Clause 36 sought to go further than the government's existing reforms, and its defeat means those additional measures will not be added to the bill. The government's approach to children's wellbeing policy therefore remains as originally drafted, without the expanded provisions the clause would have introduced. The vote divided sharply along government-versus-opposition lines. Every Labour and Labour and Co-operative MP who voted did so against the clause, providing the Noes with their majority. All 91 voting Conservatives and all 59 voting Liberal Democrats supported the clause, joined by small numbers from Reform UK, the Green Party, the DUP, and independents. There were no Labour rebels. The vote reflects a pattern seen in related divisions during this period, in which opposition parties have united to push for broader measures on education policy while the government has held firm on limiting bills to its own agenda.
Voting Aye meant
Support writing a statutory ban on mobile phones in schools into law, arguing the evidence of harm to children's wellbeing is compelling and requires a firm legislative response.
Voting No meant
Oppose a statutory phone ban, preferring the existing government guidance approach or rejecting this specific Conservative amendment, while potentially supporting phone restrictions through other means.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
284
77
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
91
0
25
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
59
0
13
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
31
11
Independent
—
1
2
11
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
5
0
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
—
2
0
2
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
0
1
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government Minister defending new clauses on corporate parenting duties (18-22) and explaining amendments on information sharing and financial oversight; emphasises landmark reforms to children's social care and keeping families together where appropriate.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (4,409 words) →
Opposes government's approach to phone bans in schools, arguing new clause 36 for full statutory ban is essential; criticises Education Secretary for contradictory messaging and claims guidance alone is failing; pushes government to support phone ban amendment.Conservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,693 words) →
Supports new clauses 3 and 4 on national care offer and mental health assessments in care; emphasises poor outcomes for care leavers and postcode lottery in support; calls for stronger accountability and consistency.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,291 words) →
Advocates for new clauses 25-28 on kinship care leave, allowances, pupil premium extension, and school admissions; argues kinship carers need parity with foster carers and that current proposals fall short of ambition.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (2,253 words) →
Raises concern about support for children with dyslexia, autism and behavioural challenges in the context of corporate parenting duties.DUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (194 words) →
Raises importance of supporting young carers and notes need for mobile phone carve-outs for health devices and those in caring roles.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (180 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0