Budget Resolution No. 35: Stamp duty land tax (additional dwellings: purchases before 1 April 2025)
378Ayes
116Noes
Carried · majority 262 · Government won153 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 378 · No 116 · DNV 153 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 6 November 2024 to approve Budget Resolution No. 35, which authorised an increase in stamp duty land tax on purchases of additional dwellings, such as second homes and buy-to-let properties, completed before 1 April 2025. The resolution passed by 378 votes to 116. Budget Resolutions are the formal mechanism by which Parliament gives legal authority to tax changes announced by the Chancellor in the Autumn Budget, allowing them to take effect immediately rather than waiting for a Finance Bill to complete its full passage. The resolution implements a higher surcharge on stamp duty for additional property purchases, targeting buyers who already own at least one home. In practical terms, it raises the cost of acquiring a second home or a rental investment property, with the government's aim being to reduce competition from investors and second-home buyers in a housing market where owner-occupier demand, particularly from first-time buyers, already outstrips supply. The measure affects anyone who completed such a purchase in the period covered by the resolution. The vote divided cleanly along party lines. All 329 Labour MPs and 35 Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted supported the resolution, alongside four Greens and five Liberal Democrats, the latter representing only a small share of that party's total MPs, with 67 having no vote recorded. All 99 voting Conservatives opposed it, joined by five Reform UK MPs and three Democratic Unionists. No Conservative voted in favour. The measure sits within a broader set of housing and taxation policies from the Autumn Budget, and the related divisions listed in the same period show a similar pattern of government victories on housing-related votes.
Voting Aye meant
Support raising stamp duty surcharges on additional property purchases, backing the government's Budget measure to cool investor and second-home demand in the housing market.
Voting No meant
Oppose this stamp duty increase on additional dwellings, likely arguing it discourages investment in the private rented sector or penalises legitimate property purchases.
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
329
0
32
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
99
17
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
5
0
66
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
35
0
7
Independent
—
4
6
4
Scottish National Party
—
0
0
9
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
5
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
3
2
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
—
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
1
0
1
Your Party
—
1
1
0
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
1
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
New Clause 1 would prevent visiting forces from ICC-indicted states or suspected war criminals entering the UK; emphasises importance of international law and preventing genocide participants from operating in Britain.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,612 words) →
Supports New Clause 4 (visa fee waiver for service dependants) and Amendments 3–5 (SEND portability, adoption/fostering continuity, NHS waiting list preservation); opposes New Clause 11 on ECHR derogation; demands clarity on Defence Investment Plan and £9.2bn military housing commitment amid Treasury cuts.Conservative · Voted no · Read full speech (3,720 words) →
Praises Bill's four key themes: Defence Housing Service, service justice reform, reservist renewal; defends extended recall age and mobilisation threshold changes as necessary for strategic reserve capacity.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (357 words) →
Welcomes armed forces covenant extension and accountability mechanisms; does not support New Clause 4 today to allow Government time to deliver manifesto pledges; calls for clearer covenant guidance and record-keeping of military families in public services.Labour · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,506 words) →
Raises concerns that NI reservists in SMEs face retention challenges from increased recall and mobilisation requirements; requests covenant amendment to explicitly include NI local councils.DUP · Voted no · Read full speech (241 words) →
Speaks in support of the Bill during Armed Forces Week; notes Liberal Democrat new clauses and amendments on related issues.Liberal Democrat · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,429 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0